I´d have no problems if guys like sceptic and redflanders would have a reasonable straight forward approach like Benotti or Hog (who think that basically everybody in the high ranks dope. It´s a fair point after all those scandals). But no, they just hack away the same old song, mixing it with personal insults, but zilch infos, reasonable arguments or evidence... It´s not anti doping thinking, but "your doper is worse than mine".
"Redflanders" honestly confirmed his love for CH, even though he thinks he´s doping. And for sceptic all is good as long the so-called Skybots get bested. No matter who that is or with which methods that goal is achieved. It ends in grotesque ideas that Sky started a doping arms race anew, and that CH had to dope upfront before Sky even hit the scene.
Anyway, now I think we shall get back to the topic...