What, is Armstrong 5'8"? He's using 175's.
I'm 5'9" 175cm ,(45,46 shoe) 80kg, and riding 175's for 4 years and can't tell much difference between the 172.5's I was using for years before that.
I got a cheap Record square taper crank right before they went to ultra torque. With a Record BB I can"t tell much (if any) difference between alloy Record square taper and Carbon Record UT either.
I have two kg 381's, a matte black 2002, and a Jalabert 2003, and an S-Works 2009 Roubaix. All nice riding with the 2002 381 riding very nice and comfortable, a little flexier than the Jalabert.
The Roubaix is the stiffest bike of the three. Why people who aren't racing want a very stiff feel is beyond me.
I'm JRA but none of this crap seems to matter much. Who in the heck is flexing frames or cranks at 80 or 90 rpms?
BTW, you can even pedal smoothly at 60 or 70 rpms, it's not necessarily "mashing."
The whole issue seems quite stupid IMHO. If the bike's fit is close to what it should be, and built up properly, just get out and ride.
It seems a lot of old school pro's also liked relatively "flexy" stuff so the stiff issue doesn't seem to matter much either.