superconfex said:
and i for one can't wait for him to return to the tour
I'd support his return, too, as long as he can be competitive in the climbing stages, and his team isn't a joke. On the topic of the correctness of letting convicted dopers return to the Tour even if they don't public humiliate themselves and beg to be accepted into the race, Vino provides a great example of why the possibility of racing the Tour should always be extended to reformed dopers. He added so much to the race, not least of all via his Tasmanian-Devil-like attacking persona.
Ricco comes across to many as being a jerk, no doubt (who would trumpet a nickname like "Cobra"...?), but after watching the ridiculous lengths that some riders went to in order to express "respect" for their competitors by basically not racing against them at some critical moments, if Ricco is strong enough to animate the race, then I'd let him return immediately. Maybe he could have done something yesterday to enliven an otherwise dreadfully-boring ascent of the Tourmalet.
Now that I'm firmly in the corner of the cycling "fan" and no longer a rider, I'm becoming more and more aware of the "entertainment" value of the sport. And that's what it should be, first and foremost, and far less so a charm school or morality-and-ethics-teaching-institution.
I think it's legitimate now to ask if the Tour's value as spectacle and - entertainment - is being mistakenly seconded to enforcing, at all costs, arbitrary standards of fair-play. It's hard to see the Tour being any better, at times, than the period of Armstrong's incredibly-boring 7-straight wins. Sure, Ullrich falling off in the final time trial and sliding into the hay along with his Bianchi was a rare moment of drama, but the race was suffocated by the American. Now it seems like it's suffocating under political correctness.
I have a new appreciation for Thor and Carlos Sastre for protesting the group-think that literally stopped the racing at critical moments, and I am re-evaluating the degree to which I celebrate Contador, when he's content to win the Tour without winning a stage and gifted the Tourmalet to Schleck.
LeMond won the Tour in 1990 w/o winning a stage, and I know for a fact that while he was relieved to take Yellow in Paris, there was an element of humiliation at not winning any stages.
In the end, it's about making fair racing (ie, racing in which the influence of doping and cheating in general is marginalized) interesting, exciting and engrossing. Assuming Vino's clean, his stage win (and his ride the previous day) perfectly represent the drama and excitement I'd like to see.
If Ricco can add to that, then bring him back ASAP.