AGR /FW because of its importance w.r.t the achievement of the triple. Gilbert/Valverde's season is based on wining at least one.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
He's got you there Netserk :lol:El Pistolero said:Netserk said:Got any google searches to back that up? :lol:
Yes, compare Frank Vandenbroucke to Jurgen van den Broeck.
Jurgen Van den Broeck: 382.000 google hitsEl Pistolero said:Netserk said:Got any google searches to back that up? :lol:
Yes, compare Frank Vandenbroucke to Jurgen van den Broeck.
The funny thing is that Pickle skewed the comparison in his favor. My quote was: "A 5th place in the Tour GC will also get you more attention than any one week race or classic"Hugo Koblet said:Jurgen Van den Broeck: 382.000 google hitsEl Pistolero said:Netserk said:Got any google searches to back that up? :lol:
Yes, compare Frank Vandenbroucke to Jurgen van den Broeck.
Frank Vandenbroucke: 344.000 google hits
Asero831 said:UCI World Tour #1 is an underrated achievement imo
It is at par with the Green Jersey
Echoes said:World Tour ranking is not an achievement, it's a rating depending on a given point system that is debatable as such.
Point classification, ditto. If you win 8 stage at the Tour of France, you of necessity have the Point classification. Yet you have already been praised for these 8 stage wins. It means you would make two "achievements" with one and the same performance. Only the intermediate sprints alter the result but what is an intermediate sprint. Point classifications of any stage races should be removed in my opinion but I know this won't happen.
Hugo Koblet said:Jurgen Van den Broeck: 382.000 google hitsEl Pistolero said:Netserk said:Got any google searches to back that up? :lol:
Yes, compare Frank Vandenbroucke to Jurgen van den Broeck.
Frank Vandenbroucke: 344.000 google hits
El Pistolero said:Hugo Koblet said:Jurgen Van den Broeck: 382.000 google hitsEl Pistolero said:Netserk said:Got any google searches to back that up? :lol:
Yes, compare Frank Vandenbroucke to Jurgen van den Broeck.
Frank Vandenbroucke: 344.000 google hits
You need to place your search term between quotation marks, so it only gives you results where the full name is used. Frank Vandenbroucke has more hits than Jurgen van den Broeck this way. Van den Broeck is quite a common surname. Vandenbroucke less so because it's an older spelling of the word.
Mr.White said:Echoes said:World Tour ranking is not an achievement, it's a rating depending on a given point system that is debatable as such.
Point classification, ditto. If you win 8 stage at the Tour of France, you of necessity have the Point classification. Yet you have already been praised for these 8 stage wins. It means you would make two "achievements" with one and the same performance. Only the intermediate sprints alter the result but what is an intermediate sprint. Point classifications of any stage races should be removed in my opinion but I know this won't happen.
Yeah, but to win that rating is an achievement
Tonton said:Once upon a time were the "classiques", until some lobotomized individuals with nothing else to do decided to create five monuments. Of all the races who lost the status, la FW is my vote.
Or maybe Stage 2 of the Ruta del Sol should be elevated to monument status, since my buddy Tibopino won it today. And Nacer would get even with Demare, having won last year's Stage 2 .
Yeah, but to win that rating is an achievement
Echoes said:How many hits for Frank Vandenbroucke, the politician homonym of the clinical "cyclist"?
Yeah, but to win that rating is an achievement
The achievements are the performances in races that account for this award wins. If you consider them all you don't need to rate the award itself, it's just judging twice the same thing. It's a good indicator but not a performance in itself.
Echoes said:How many hits for Frank Vandenbroucke, the politician homonym of the clinical "cyclist"?
Yeah, but to win that rating is an achievement
The achievements are the performances in races that account for this award wins. If you consider them all you don't need to rate the award itself, it's just judging twice the same thing. It's a good indicator but not a performance in itself.
Mr.White said:Echoes said:How many hits for Frank Vandenbroucke, the politician homonym of the clinical "cyclist"?
Yeah, but to win that rating is an achievement
The achievements are the performances in races that account for this award wins. If you consider them all you don't need to rate the award itself, it's just judging twice the same thing. It's a good indicator but not a performance in itself.
Well, I don't agree. You can compare this with for example Formula One Championship, or ATP year-end No.1. You got races/tournaments as award itself, and then you have the ultimate prize at the end of the year to determine who really was the most successful and most consistent one.
Hugo Koblet said:Jurgen Van den Broeck: 382.000 google hitsEl Pistolero said:Netserk said:Got any google searches to back that up? :lol:
Yes, compare Frank Vandenbroucke to Jurgen van den Broeck.
Frank Vandenbroucke: 344.000 google hits
Red Rick said:Out of these, definitely the worlds TT