- Jul 22, 2009
- 107
- 0
- 0
I've been following the developments of this lawsuit for the last couple of weeks and there have been tons of circumstantial evidence discussed in the forums.
For instance, recorded third party phone conversations, accusations of payoffs to different people and organizations, etc, etc.
One thing I haven't heard anyone really talk about, (although I could have missed it), is concrete evidence that can be used to pin on Armstrong.
Like the saying goes: 'It ain't what you know, it's what you can prove in court'.
I know Landis claims he was shown the details of how to dope by Armstrong while he was with Postal (which I tend to believe), but will there be any SOLID evidence that will come out in this case?
I mean, can they go after those '99 urine samples with the EPO, and if so, will they still be valid after 11 years?
Anyone think they'll find receipts or a paper trail to someone like Ferrari, etc???
Just curious to everyone else's thoughts on how this thing might unfold...
For instance, recorded third party phone conversations, accusations of payoffs to different people and organizations, etc, etc.
One thing I haven't heard anyone really talk about, (although I could have missed it), is concrete evidence that can be used to pin on Armstrong.
Like the saying goes: 'It ain't what you know, it's what you can prove in court'.
I know Landis claims he was shown the details of how to dope by Armstrong while he was with Postal (which I tend to believe), but will there be any SOLID evidence that will come out in this case?
I mean, can they go after those '99 urine samples with the EPO, and if so, will they still be valid after 11 years?
Anyone think they'll find receipts or a paper trail to someone like Ferrari, etc???
Just curious to everyone else's thoughts on how this thing might unfold...