- Jun 16, 2009
- 757
- 0
- 0
auscyclefan94 said:Well, I highly doubt you were the one who voted "Balls and all".![]()
LaFlorecita said:I wonder who voted "Every hair is sacred." Ew!
Edit: I hope it isn't you!![]()
Sofía_ said:for some unknow reason i found men shaved legs quite sexy... so i'll be all eyes![]()
MarkvW said:How much of a difference in speed does shaving make, anyway?
MarkvW said:How much of a difference in speed does shaving make, anyway?
Martin318is said:I havew generally found that shaved legs heal nearly twice as fast (and more cleanly) than hairy ones. Thats what you meant right? Hope you´re not on a cycling forum thinking leg shaving is a speed issue
Martin318is said:I havew generally found that shaved legs heal nearly twice as fast (and more cleanly) than hairy ones. Thats what you meant right? Hope you´re not on a cycling forum thinking leg shaving is a speed issue
Swifty's Cakes said:When I get so good that I need to worry about how quickly I recover from cut or grazed legs and getting a nice massage I'll shave my legs.
Bespoke said:Greetings all,
Is there another sport, other than swimming perhaps - and even then I'm not sure it trickles down to recreational swimmers, where a similar body "adjustment", is part of engaging in the sport?
In Canada, hockey players usually sacrifice their front teeth to the game but I'm pretty sure that's by circumstance, rather than by choice.
That's precisely the point. It is all those things, in a sport widely acknowledged as having those characteristics underlying. But what they underlie - the overt reasons - are respect for traditional practices, of which shaving is one, and practical concerns - see below.I say this as someone who, rather suddenly, has been seduced by cycling and am finding this whole shaving thing a bit weird.
Don't get me wrong, as a dedicated aesthete, I certainly appreciate the appearance of a hairless body but, that's part of the problem for me: it seems fetishistic, narcissistic and, some might say homoerotic. Not that there's anything wrong with any of these attributes! I'm really trying to understand it from the periphery, realizing that the vortex of passion for the sport is likely going to lead to an inevitable question:
"To shave or not to shave?"![]()
Caruut said:Good call. Wounds are less messy and easier to clean without hair, and a massage from your soigneur is less likely to end up ripping hairs out/tangling them up if haven't got them.
Didn't know that it healed much quicker. Is that a documented thing or just personal experience?
badboyberty said:How high is too high?
Maxiton said:But if it's that common, and I don't doubt it is, it is kind of by choice - i.e., I love hockey, I wonder when I'm gonna get my teeth knocked out.Personally, I'd rather sacrifice the hair.
That's precisely the point. It is all those things, in a sport widely acknowledged as having those characteristics underlying. But what they underlie - the overt reasons - are respect for traditional practices, of which shaving is one, and practical concerns - see below.
The main reason for it all along, in my view, is that some men look like apes when they're unshaven. Especially in Southern Europe where much of pro cycling has its roots. Who'd want to see a hairy ape on a bike? Nobody, that's who.
I'm lucky in that the hair on my legs is blond and sparse, so it looks like I shave even though I don't. If I were racing, or had time to train for hours a day, then I would shave, for the reasons Caruut stated. And if I had noticeable hair, I'd be shaving anyway. Hairy, burly legs in cycling kit just isn't right.