VdP is more likely to have the better career in the future but let's say they if both retire tomorrow I would take rainbows over Amstel or anything else VdP won this yearI'm still waiting for response on Pedersen and VdP?
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
VdP is more likely to have the better career in the future but let's say they if both retire tomorrow I would take rainbows over Amstel or anything else VdP won this yearI'm still waiting for response on Pedersen and VdP?
I bet at the time Valverde would have swapped all those for rainbows so ya
Yes.
Not really close imo.
Actually the answer to that question is no. He was asked that question in 2015 and he said no without hesitating. He said the reason is because those podiums show his consistency.
Like every rider ever who says he is so happy with his new team and he's the happiest he ever been.
Riders lie to the media even your god bala there's a reason why he cried last year collecting his rainbows and not after his consistent podiums
So the 1 race he has wanted most since childhood isn't worth swapping for this:Correct, he cried when he finally got the rainbow jersey as it's something he's wanted since he was a child. However, and this is big. He has said many times that his Worlds podium record means a great deal to him because it's a reflection of the consistency of his career. Those Worlds medals do mean a great deal to him because the Worlds not the Tour is what he always talked about wanting as a child. (Yes his 2015 Tour podium also meant a great deal to him. His crying on the top of Alp d'Huez showed that. He said after that podium he finally believed he belonged at that level.)
It is not important what he wants, or what do you think he wants to be precise! That was not a question. The question was who had a better season, Valverde or Gilbert in 2012? There's no need to argue what would someone of them wanted to win more. Gilbert, for example, would trade good part of his results for San Remo win now. But that's not the part of our conversation here. We need to look objective who had the better season. For me it is Valverde, without a doubt, Same as I think Van Der Poel had a better season then Mads Pedersen last year. I value consistency, I value wins throughout the year, I value high placings. For me you need to show high level in number of occasions to claim you had a good year. For me it is not enough to win one day (no matter where and when that was, whether Worlds, Roubaix, Ronde, Lombardia, etc.) and claim you had excellent year. No, you had just one excellent day! That doesn't make it a year. Or is Bettiol one of the top performers of the year? Matthew Hayman? Oliver Zaugg? For me, just no!So the 1 race he has wanted most since childhood isn't worth swapping for this:
Vuelta podium (2nd) + 2 stages + points classification, TDf stage, Worlds podium (3rd), PN stage (3rd overall), TDU stage (2nd overall) , Andalucia overall + stage
Yeah it does, but if you add Vuelta 2nd and Worlds 3rd, then no.I was wondering if it was a trick question. Of course the WCRR beats a Tour stage, a Paris Nice stage, a TDU stage and Andalucia.
So the 1 race he has wanted most since childhood isn't worth swapping for this:
Vuelta podium (2nd) + 2 stages + points classification, TDf stage, Worlds podium (3rd), PN stage (3rd overall), TDU stage (2nd overall) , Andalucia overall + stage
Oh so you are looking objectivly and picking Valverde what a suprise. What year are you being "objective" and not picking Valverde.It is not important what he wants, or what do you think he wants to be precise! That was not a question. The question was who had a better season, Valverde or Gilbert in 2012? There's no need to argue what would someone of them wanted to win more. Gilbert, for example, would trade good part of his results for San Remo win now. But that's not the part of our conversation here. We need to look objective who had the better season. For me it is Valverde, without a doubt, Same as I think Van Der Poel had a better season then Mads Pedersen last year. I value consistency, I value wins throughout the year, I value high placings. For me you need to show high level in number of occasions to claim you had a good year. For me it is not enough to win one day (no matter where and when that was, whether Worlds, Roubaix, Ronde, Lombardia, etc.) and claim you had excellent year. No, you had just one excellent day! That doesn't make it a year. Or is Bettiol one of the top performers of the year? Matthew Hayman? Oliver Zaugg? For me, just no!
Dunbar has shown far, far more talent than Froome did at the same age.And Eddie Dunbar does a Froome and comes from nowhere to be the greatest GC rider of his generation
I'm picking Valverde over Gilbert every season from 2012-2019 as I said before. I'm not picking him over everyone...Oh so you are looking objectivly and picking Valverde what a suprise. What year are you being "objective" and not picking Valverde.
"We need to look objective who had the better season. For me it is Valverde, without a doubt"
That is not being objective its quite the opposite
I'd pick Gilbert over Valverde in 2019. Quite easily in fact.I'm picking Valverde over Gilbert every season from 2012-2019 as I said before. I'm not picking him over everyone...
I wouldn't.I'd pick Gilbert over Valverde in 2019. Quite easily in fact.
I don't know, maybe you're right. But the way I see it, one great win can make the season great for not really great riders, like Pedersen, Hyman, Zaugg, Carapaz, Demare, Ciolek, Bettiol... (some of them could prove me wrong in time), but if we're talking about absolute best, a riders of the year, then for me it is not enough. Gilbert had a great season, yes, but they were not 2012 and 2019, but 2010, 2011 and 2017. Former were good seasons, but not great imo. Same as Nibali, he won Milan-San Remo in 2018, an outstanding win, in spectacular manner, while not being even close to a top favorite before the race. But for me it doesn't make his season great. Very good, yes, but great no. I don't know, maybe I'm the one who is wrong on all this, but I just see things that way.One great win, can make the season great. Especially in this sport. Where few are lucky to win many races at all. Over a career.
Some races has more prestige and are harder to win, and will be held in a higher regard.
I think most would trade a few wins in smaller races for a big one.
I don't know, maybe you're right. But the way I see it, one great win can make the season great for not really great riders, like Pedersen, Hyman, Zaugg, Carapaz, Demare, Ciolek, Bettiol... (some of them could prove me wrong in time), but if we're talking about absolute best, a riders of the year, then for me it is not enough. Gilbert had a great season, yes, but they were not 2012 and 2019, but 2010, 2011 and 2017. Former were good seasons, but not great imo. Same as Nibali, he won Milan-San Remo in 2018, an outstanding win, in spectacular manner, while not being even close to a top favorite before the race. But for me it doesn't make his season great. Very good, yes, but great no. I don't know, maybe I'm the one who is wrong on all this, but I just see things that way.
Had we even heard of Froome at that age.Dunbar has shown far, far more talent than Froome did at the same age.
Had we even heard of Froome at that age.
Really exited to see how Dunbar goes over the next few years
One great win, can make the season great. Especially in this sport. Where few are lucky to win many races at all. Over a career.
Some races has more prestige and are harder to win, and will be held in a higher regard.
I think most would trade a few wins in smaller races for a big one.
One great win saves a season, it doesn't make a great season. My opinion obviously.
Or are you saying it was an average season, but at least he won a monument?
This depends on what expectactions we as fans put on the rider and the expectations the rider puts on himself or his team.
In someone's mind a win in a monument would make a career, not just a season. This could be said of both fans and riders. It is easy for us to project our (fans) expectations into this debate, but they are mostly meaningless without knowing the expectations of the rider or his or her team.
Winning a Monument is big, or WC, I won't deny that. It makes a career for some riders, and many good riders never achieve that. But I was trying to make another point. Results throughout the whole season matters too. You can have a good season even if you didn't had that big win (although I notice little obsession with those around here, as if that is the only thing that matters in cycling).I’d say winning a monument. Would count for a good/great season in someones career. Other results can only make it better. Since a monument is so hard to win, it is automatically a great season if you win one. No matter who you are. In this case, your examples are both legends in this sport. Since they have won so much. Which very few does.
Just because it wasnt their best season, when you compare their whole career, it shouldnt diminish what they acheived that separate year.
It is unfair to say otherwhise, at least I think so.
Winning a Monument is big, or WC, I won't deny that. It makes a career for some riders, and many good riders never achieve that. But I was trying to make another point. Results throughout the whole season matters too. You can have a good season even if you didn't had that big win (although I notice little obsession with those around here, as if that is the only thing that matters in cycling).
Gilbert 2019 - very good season
Riders who had a better year - Roglic, Alaphilippe, Bernal, Fuglsang, Valverde, Pogacar, Van Der Poel.
Nibali 2018 - Also a very good season
Riders who had a better year - Valverde, Sagan, Simon Yates, Viviani, Alaphilippe, Geraint Thomas, Dumoulin, Pinot, Froome.