SafeBet said:
I'm just saying the competition was not as weak as you are suggesting.
Both Froome and Cobo were in exceptional form. Martin and Mollema were also very good. Plus Menchov and Purito.
Nibs faded in the third week, but it's not like he was completely out of form to my eyes. Scarponi on the other hand...yeah you know about it.
Wiggins did ok in last year Vuelta. And he's been previously 4th in the TdF (beating the likes of Frank Schleck and Nibbles). Results say he can sustain multiple MTF in a 3 week race.
Ummmm..... Froome and Cobo two supposed domestiques were in good form all right. Mollema was in good form yet he was never truly considered a proper contestant for the overall and like Froome and Cobo had never proved much in previous GTs.
Menchov was never a contester as he was awful in the first 2 weeks or so and only started coming good towards the end, where on the only mountain stage- Angliru- he was way better than Wiggins.
Purito could climb short stuff he could do that with his eyes closed, and on the longer climbs he never once finished in the front group and was evidently in pretty awful form.
Martin isnt worth mentioning, he couldnt climb that Vuelta and whether he ever will be capable is up to debate.....

Nibali wasnt that bad, just he wasnt up to the rigours of a 3 week race and Scarponi wasnt great at all.
And Anton as well wasnt existent either.
You have to remember that all these riders you mentioned also rode and completed a GT previously in the season (not Froome and Cobo) and therefore they were not up to top form.
You can prove Wiggin's is capable of winning the tour from a lot of things but not from last years Vuelta.