Tour de France Who will win the 2024 Tour de France? Pre-race poll.

[Taxus4a]

Wow ... the bookies have the race now as a 50-50 chance between Vingo and Pogi. Remco moved up to 10 to 1, Roglic dropped to 25 to 1.

Roglic had before to start better than 25 to 1?
He is like Contador after 2011, a good GC rider to win lot of races, but not with the best at his best. 25 to 1 is correct before to start becose the rest can crash or things like that. He is the best of humans but now he is againts ET riders.
Good thing he said he didnt have the legs, no excuses. He is a reliable rider for podium, wich had a big merit if he get.

 

[FroomeWagon]

Roglic had before to start better than 25 to 1?
He is like Contador after 2011, a good GC rider to win lot of races, but not with the best at his best. 25 to 1 is correct before to start becose the rest can crash or things like that. He is the best of humans but now he is againts ET riders.
Good thing he said he didnt have the legs, no excuses. He is a reliable rider for podium, wich had a big merit if he get.

Roglic was about 11 or 12 to 1 before the race started. Basically Roglic and Remco have swapped odds.

 

[Krzysztof_O]

Roglic was about 11 or 12 to 1 before the race started. Basically Roglic and Remco have swapped odds.

The combined odds of Roglic and Remco are less favorable to them than before. It's obviously because Vingo showed his level yesterday and his perceived chances increased.

 

[CyclistAbi]

Just look at the poll above, before you start rationalizing about (current) betting odds. In the gist of it it's the same people, or better the same logic behind it. Or better to say lack of it.

 

[SHAD0W93]

Just look at the poll above, before you start rationalizing about (current) betting odds. In the gist of it it's the same people, or better the same logic behind it. Or better to say lack of it.

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/_8l5tq_8rX8?si=IGKFv4i8BvG1Maal

 

[Rackham]

Roglic was about 11 or 12 to 1 before the race started. Basically Roglic and Remco have swapped odds.

This just shows how irrelevant the bookmakers are if you're trying to correctly gauge outcomes at this stage, i.e. their reactionary odds swapping based on a low altitude murito in Italy is totally asinine.

In any case their one objective is to make money, so they'd obviously rather not pay out anything. It doesn't matter whether the odds are long or short, i.e. the more people bet on the wrong horse, the better it is for the bookies.

Every time.