Let's see if the forum agrees with the bookmakers. The first names are in alphabetical order. If you think "other" mention the name in the forum.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Of course not. We vote with our hearts not our wallets!Pantani_lives said:Let's see if the forum agrees with the bookmakers. The first names are in alphabetical order. If you think "other" mention the name in the forum.
However it looks like the same top 2 at the moment: Froome and Dumoulin. I have my doubts about Dumoulin, because there are more serious mountain stages than last year, so I think climbers like López and Aru might have a better chance. I voted López, but that's a vote with the heart. He might just win a stage and finish fifth. Objectively Froome is favorite, but I don't want to see him win. I really hope the climbers can tear it apart this year.Escarabajo said:Of course not. We vote with our hearts not our wallets!Pantani_lives said:Let's see if the forum agrees with the bookmakers. The first names are in alphabetical order. If you think "other" mention the name in the forum.
You think Froome would have been dropped on Foza and Piancavallo like Tom? I certainly think Froome is more consistent and better on back-to-back mountain stages.Red Rick said:I have trouble seeing Froome as a superior climber when looking at 2017.
That's true, but he still has his time trial, his regularity and a strong team, so even without dropping all the others on a climb he's still a candidate. I don't think he's as much the favorite as in last year's Tour however. It remains to be seen how he copes with those steep Italian mountains in the final nine days.Red Rick said:I have trouble seeing Froome as a superior climber when looking at 2017.
Hard to say. Dumoulin was alone, and limited the damage very well on his own. Something Froome never had to do.Netserk said:You think Froome would have been dropped on Foza and Piancavallo like Tom? I certainly think Froome is more consistent and better on back-to-back mountain stages.Red Rick said:I have trouble seeing Froome as a superior climber when looking at 2017.
They also underestimated Dumoulin last year and Nibali and Quintana spent much of the race looking at each other rather than attackingRed Rick said:Hard to say. Dumoulin was alone, and limited the damage very well on his own. Something Froome never had to do.Netserk said:You think Froome would have been dropped on Foza and Piancavallo like Tom? I certainly think Froome is more consistent and better on back-to-back mountain stages.Red Rick said:I have trouble seeing Froome as a superior climber when looking at 2017.
I honestly believe that Dumoulin's climbing before that was stronger than Froome on the big climbs in 2017.
A palmares is exactly that, a reflection of the rider he used to be. At the same time, younger riders are just entering their best years.Parker said:Froome.
At some point in his career he'll fade, but as it stands he won the last two Grand Tours and has more Grand Tour wins and podiums than the rest of the startlist combined.
Pinot and Dumoulin to complete the podium.
Superman's ITT is mediocre. He'll lose at least 2 to 3 minutes in Trento.Red Rick said:Yeah, watch out for Lopez. He's produced a few deceptively good ITTs in the past and if he takes off uphill he's hard to get back.
All of his results in (official) prologues and timetrials:
2018
- 8th in National Championships (25k) - flat time trial, lost more than a minute to Bernal
- 28th in Abu Dhabi (12.6k) - flat, 50 seconds slower than Dennis, which is a lot over 12k
- 75th in Tirreno (10.05k) - flat once more, bad shape in Tirreno. Which resulted in a loss of 1:05 to Dennis
2017
- 2nd in Österreich-Rundfahrt (0.8k) - the first 800m of Schlossberg, so a climbing prologue
- 141st in Suiza (6k) - flat prologue, only his second day of racing of the season, so not too much to read into, but 141st out of 176 is pretty bad
- 22nd in Vuelta (40.2) - rolling-ish timetrial. Result itself not that bad, but lost 2:34 to Froome.
2016
- 2nd in Suiza (16.8k) - tougher than advertised, not really comparable to Longroño
- 36th in Suiza (6.4k) - hillyish prologue in Baarn
- 64th in Romandia (15.1k) - hilly timetrial in Sion, lost 1:29 to Pinot
- 35th in Romandia (3.95k) - hillyish prologue in La Chaux-de-Fonds, lost 21 seconds to Izagirre
- 9th in Itzulia (16.5k) - Arrate, so a very, very tough timetrial
- 4th in National Championships (35.2k) - flat timetrial, lost 1:22 to Walter Vargas, 0:37 to Brayan Ramirez
2015
- 46th in Suiza (38.4k) - hilly timetrial in Bern, lost 3 minutes to Dumoulin
- 99th in Suiza (5.1k) - flat prologue, lost 26 seconds to Dumoulin
2014
- 36th in World Championships U23 (36.1k) - flat time trial, lost 2:37 to Campbell Flakemore
- 4th in National Championships U23 (25k) - flat (IIRC) time trial, lost 1:25 to Carlos Ramirez
They're not from days of yore. He's just been the first person to win back to back GTs in twenty years. Literally in the last two races.Red Rick said:A palmares is exactly that, a reflection of the rider he used to be. At the same time, younger riders are just entering their best years.Parker said:Froome.
At some point in his career he'll fade, but as it stands he won the last two Grand Tours and has more Grand Tour wins and podiums than the rest of the startlist combined.
Pinot and Dumoulin to complete the podium.