Eyjafjallajokull said:
Completely disagree. There wouldn't be doping in most of these sports if they had the same testing regime that cycling has - it just wouldn't be worth the cost of getting caught. The reason doping still persists in cycling is the direct correlation with successful output.
In soccer, for instance, yes it would help if you took EPO to run around the pitch for longer and harder, but it wouldn't necessarily produce a better outcome. In cycling that IS the outcome.
I don't think you quite understand the effect of EPO. Or the concept that if your hct is, say, 60%, and you have a MD minding your profile, just what advantage you have in ANY sport over about 10 minutes.
Soccer, Rugby, Hockey, Cycling, Tennis, Swimming, Boxing, etc. etc. etc.
ALL gain benefit from EPO.... or oxygen vector/blood manipulation, if that opens the scope.
Puerto - Nadal anyone? there is your non-cycling example.
Heck, the BALCO case even had Dana Stubblefield, an American footballer, admit EPO was a part of his regular program (
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=stubblefield+epo)
Look, you can think what you want, and I honestly don't expect you to "trust" me, but I do know what I am talking about.