biker77 said:
How did you feel the day after the race you weren`t fully trained for? How about a race you are fully trained for?
I understand the comparisons to track and field. It is much easier to push yourself running than it is on a bike, imo. Track and field athletes don't maintain form for 3 weeks, though.
In Chris Carmichaels LA training plan book, he says you will be tired in week 3 but persevere as week 4 is a rest where the body works its magic. How does this fit with his "you get stronger in the third week of tour" opinion as of late?
As to the race i wasn't trained for, i was working on the road for at least 3 months straight kept myself in good shape physically(running) but had not had more than a day or two on my bike before the race . A teammate begged me to start the race for support.
I was tired & sore the next day, but went for a recovery ride and was fine actually the race seemed to be a good stepping stone to better fitness.
A race i am fully trained for i usually dont feel any different the next day than i did on race morning.
I also agree it is much easier to push yourself running, cycling is a much more efficient activity. Racing you spend alot of time not pedaling, lots of short bursts. You cant do that running. Even fartlek training or your recovery jog in interval training involve more effort than cycling recovery.
I use alot of hill repeats to get my heart rate up and work near my threshold.
For instance my first couple reps on a half mile 9 percent climb will stay in the 150 bpm range and nowhere near my max of 198.
after 5 reps i need to concentrate on climbing efficiently to keep my heart rate around 165
around reps 7-10 my heartrate is just about my at of 172
and then i will add a little burst so i have 30 seconds in the 185 range.
Running even my most efficient stride & pace will be at 145-150 bpm
any sort of intervals i will be working in the 180's