13,000,000 people in the US watched the USA-England game on TV. Add another 1-2 million in bars and that is a fair amount of fans.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Race Radio said:13,000,000 people in the US watched the USA-England game on TV. Add another 1-2 million in bars and that is a fair amount of fans.
Race Radio said:13,000,000 people in the US watched the USA-England game on TV. Add another 1-2 million in bars and that is a fair amount of fans.
uphillstruggle said:Yeah but that is around 3% of the US population whereas at a guess around 40% of the UK would have tune in for that crap excuse for a football match.
rhubroma said:Soccer is too elegant for Americans, they either like raw prepotency (NFL) or else corney, nastalgic imperialism (baseball).
In any case the origins of soccer-football go back to an ancient Roman military camp game among the soldiers, which still "lives" on today in Florence (calcio fiorentino) which has to be the most caotic, violent clash on a playing field that exists. Then the British gave it rules.
Sport reflects culture and if one is not within a certain "culture" one can "miss the point" as it has been suggested. This only reinforces America's detachment from the rest of the planet and also affirms its superpower status.
Race Radio said:What else are you going to do in England?
uphillstruggle said:Train in the rain. It's what gave guy's like millar their mental strength and never say die attitude.
Yes, because Americans are often self obsessed!alberto.legstrong said:The NFL wants Europeans to like Am. Football so they can make more money. The American people really could care less who likes Am. Football. We love it, we don't need other people to love it to feel validated.
+1BroDeal said:Nothing. Soccer is boring as hell. The number of goals is way too low. It's like watching a porno where the actors seldom get past second base.
Race Radio said:What else are you going to do in England?
auscyclefan94 said:There are many codes of sport which can call themselves Football before Soccer can.
TeamSkyFans said:name some.. football was called football long before other things called themselves football, hence why other things are not called football
In the 1300s, the king of England, Edward III, banned football, hockey, and handball. This shows a difference between sports using the feet, hands and sticks. So football was traditionally played using the feet and not the hands.
In 1863,at Cambridge University, a group of Englishmen formed the Football Association and invented the modern game of football.
After this event, many other "versions" of football were invented. Rugby and Australian rules were the first. In North America, rugby and football were both played, and a hybrid, American football, was invented.
The first sport called football with global rules is football; other sports using the term football have words placed in front such as rugby, American or Aussie Rules (Australian) or Gaelic (Irish) to differentiate them from association football.
auscyclefan94 said:Oh, I am going to eat this thread for breakfast.
1. Soccer is a game where hardly anyone scores. There is very little action.
2. 98% of the time the players just chip the ball around backwards.
3. The players are ALL a bunch of actors and wusses! Even when they clearly don't touch the player they still roll around like they have broken their leg.
4. Their is very little physicality in the game.
5. It is a slow game.
Now don't take me wrong. I do know it is the "world game" and I have tried to appreciate as others have tried to get me into it but honestly it is so boring. I think if many of the europeans and americans saw how skilled and athletic the Australian Rules Footballers are and how fast and physical it is I think some of you would recognise what a great exciting game it is.
I watched the germany Australian game and even when germany were ripping it apart and scoring, there were still a lot of boring parts in it.
btw, it is Soccer in Aus and always will be. There are many codes of sport which can call themselves Football before Soccer can.
Indeed. Calling it a boring sport is a strange argument, coming from a cycling loverrhubroma said:For many folks cycling would be categorized as like watching grass grow.
rhubroma said:For the sport's fan base, which means pretty much the world, your assessment shows an utter misunderstanding of the sport.
Little physicality? The athleticism of the sport, and its elegance, is to be appreciated in how the players must resort to every means to place the ball in the net without hands. This is the challenge and the apeal.
And I'm no fan of the sport, in the sense that I don't follow it.
For many folks cycling would be categorized as like watching grass grow.
auscyclefan94 said:Oh, I am going to eat this thread for breakfast.
1. Soccer is a game where hardly anyone scores. There is very little action.
2. 98% of the time the players just chip the ball around backwards.
3. The players are ALL a bunch of actors and wusses! Even when they clearly don't touch the player they still roll around like they have broken their leg.
4. Their is very little physicality in the game.
5. It is a slow game.
Now don't take me wrong. I do know it is the "world game" and I have tried to appreciate as others have tried to get me into it but honestly it is so boring. I think if many of the europeans and americans saw how skilled and athletic the Australian Rules Footballers are and how fast and physical it is I think some of you would recognise what a great exciting game it is.
I watched the germany Australian game and even when germany were ripping it apart and scoring, there were still a lot of boring parts in it.
btw, it is Soccer in Aus and always will be. There are many codes of sport which can call themselves Football before Soccer can.
marinoni said:I considered putting this in the Fifa thread but I think it deserves it's own discussion. Why don't I and many of my countrymen and US neighbours like soccer? Sure, it's status is improving but it's still at best a second tier sport, MLS is struggling in several cities etc. I watched a little bit of the world cup this am and here are my impressions. There is a certain excitement watching when you know that practically every single person in the two countries involved is watching. It makes me feel like a citizen of the world instead of just a Canadian. Beyond that I find it excruciating to watch. If I see the same two guys pass the ball between each other one more time I'm gonna f***in loose it! I've heard the argument that North Americans are too in love with sports with constant action( x games, basketball etc) to enjoy the subtleties of soccer. Well I'm a fan of cycling and baseball, so that doesn't really fly. Also, I have a problem with players rolling around crying because someone tapped them in the shin; or in many cases never came close. Finally, the offside rule, at least sometimes, seems like the dumbest rule in sports. Seems like a player should be rewarded for getting in behind the oppositions defense.
Please understand that I mean none of this in an arrogant or disrespectful manner. Soccer is the #1 sport in virtually every country on the planet except ours. Only a complete jerk would suggest we're the only ones with any sense. But that said, can someone tell me WHAT AM I MISSING?
Offtheback said:NFL, (Formally Victorian "Football" League), bouncing the ball alternatively from one end of the oval pitch to the other and kicking the ball between mile wide posts, where you get 6 points , or 1 if you miss and you get scores of 100 odd. Riveting! No wonder 99.99% of the population aren't interested. Yeah, and I'm an Aussie.
Buffalo Soldier said:BTW, for once and for all: