Why I quit

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 9, 2010
6,255
2
17,485
Little rat face squealer. Right out of a small time crime flick..

As if anyone in this world would really need to feel 'flattered' that the great disgraced cheat Armstrong deemed you worthy enough for passing notice.

Large gag.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Funny too is that Herman could really mess with my legal career privately and I'd never know. The law community is not as big as people think, and all it takes is a call. Pretty uncool information I have to say. Also pretty uncool that cyclingnews.com allowed something like that to happen with no repercussions to Papp. Really uncool actually them being complicit in something like that and then having it maybe happen again when they were aware of the incident the first time. Good thing I saved that original PM, right?...
 
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
mewmewmew13 said:
Little rat face squealer. Right out of a small time crime flick..

As if anyone in this world would really need to feel 'flattered' that the great disgraced cheat Armstrong deemed you worthy enough for passing notice.


Large gag.

I was thinking slimeball, but I think you've outdone that by a damn sight. :D
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
the word Joe Papp was searching for is "arbitrary" :D

I must admit I am in a complete quandary with Joe Papp. Using, caught, fessing up, then dealing, caught, dobbing in clients. I suspected he is just like most people, he has failings and succumbs in weak moments. The revelation of dealing with Herman though really is reprehensible. He seems to have a propensity to throw others under the bus. I wont throw a stone (it certainly wouldn't be the first lol) because sometimes he says the right things. As I say, its a quandary.
 
May 21, 2010
581
0
0
mewmewmew13 said:
Little rat face squealer. Right out of a small time crime flick..

As if anyone in this world would really need to feel 'flattered' that the great disgraced cheat Armstrong deemed you worthy enough for passing notice.

Large gag.

Well, to be fair, he's not really like a rat at all. More like a mole ...
 
May 20, 2010
801
0
0
sittingbison said:
the word Joe Papp was searching for is "arbitrary" :D

I must admit I am in a complete quandary with Joe Papp. Using, caught, fessing up, then dealing, caught, dobbing in clients. I suspected he is just like most people, he has failings and succumbs in weak moments. The revelation of dealing with Herman though really is reprehensible. He seems to have a propensity to throw others under the bus. I wont throw a stone (it certainly wouldn't be the first lol) because sometimes he says the right things. As I say, its a quandary.

Papp's behaviour is very confusing to me, and has raised many a red flag. After being made aware of what transpired regarding RaceRadio and him some time ago, I have completely ignored him. If what happened is in fact true--and I have no reason to believe that it is not--then he is someone best avoided. It seems highly plausible that he's desperately seeking attention, and most definitely acts in his own self-interest.
He doesn't seem even remotely repentant for his role in the doping culture.

Either way, I do like this forum in many ways, but am a bit bothered by what has happened.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
Nice of RR to add some details. When I found out I wondered whether Papp had come across the information and then an opportunity presented itself for him to sell it or whether he had befriended RR with the intent of getting information he could sell. Turns out it was the slimier of the two scenarios.

Joe got his well known nickname way before he was caught doping. I guess that should have been a big clue.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Super duper uncool that cyclingnews.com might have allowed that to happen again without warning us it happened the first time(I'd heard an ugly rumor, but never heard anything else, so I figured it was blown out of proportion or something. I mean, I have defended Joe MANY times here. I even wrote a letter to the judge in his case a couple of years ago before he was sentenced telling the judge he as a nice guy...I figured I would be able to trust him), or banning him before it could happen again...really uncool...
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
mewmewmew13 said:
Little rat face squealer. Right out of a small time crime flick..

mewmewmew13 said:
I live in a world of 'noir'. :D

I immediately thought of THIS:

film-noir-warners_zpsa804ef2b.jpg
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
Remember how Papp was outraged when Andrew Tilin doped to write a book? The two go back a bit.

From: Mike
Subject: Re: You are apparently now famous
Thanks for the e-mail alert Big Jonny, I just read some of Joe’s posts on that blog link you sent.

It’s a badge of honor to be despised and smeared by Joe Papp. I am in good company.

I was interviewed by Andrew Tillin the author of the Outside mag article on Joe. He wrote a very sympathetic article towards Joe. Then Joe writes that post about Andrew in his blog, where he claims Andrew misrepresented him. On the phone with Andrew, you should of heard the sympathy coming from Andrew regarding Joe. Andrew was very conscious of illustrating both sides of Joe, the scam artist side, and also what path Joe has taken; we talked about the duality of Joe Papp for some time. But Joe is playing the victim. That’s his story and he’s sticking to it. Andrew said to me; “Do you know who gave me your name and contact info? Joe Papp himself.”
Of course he did.

Joe set up the whole interview and Outside magazine article. He supplied the names, the contacts, the stories. Andrew checked them out to determine if they were true enough … and he went with it. Joe is
pretending that it is all some evil plot, and he’s a good guy done in by a investigative reporter “heavy”. Joe worked side by side with Andrew over a period of months to write that article. Andrew told me he didn’t do a whole lot of peripheral work, he did enough to see what themes emerged and to check if it was true. That article is no conspiracy about Joe, it’s Joe himself. Andrew let Joe present himself, and Andrew stayed true to what Joe presented in all ways.

Joe’s point is to pretend the vitriol pointed towards him, is because he took a stand against doping (after being the biggest doper America has ever produced, after Tyler Hamilton, geez, maybe bigger than Tyler). But that isn’t it at all. Nobody here cares if Joe “spit in the soup” or not. That’s a Euro peloton thing with it’s decades of tacitly known doping culture. That’s not an American ethic or viewpoint. America always believes in the underdog, the person who does bad, turns around and makes a comeback. Americans are not against Joe Papp the Doper, other than the racers who he cheated at race after race, year after year while Joe was doped and they were not. In the classic “spit in the soup” theme it’s the other racers who dope who hate the informant. But that’s not who is turning out against Joe. It is the racers who DID NOT DOPE who hate Joe.

The vitriol directed at Joe is from the people who’ve known him for years and years, and know what a incessant scam artist he is. He’s always pulling a manipulation, an untrue conclusion from a story of
half-truths, a “business deal” that is clearly a scam. Also the Division 3 racers, who are just working stiffs and love to race and are not dopers, and then there is Joe who was stealing their winnings for years, doping like crazy, amongst guys who make maybe 20K a year doing the pro cycling thing.

Joe is hated, because he is a scumbag. His USADA case against Floyd Landis is a classic example. Everybody who knows Joe, knows why Joe did it. For the attention. The same reason he netted and fostered the Outside magazine article. He never knew Floyd. He never raced at Floyd’s level. Joe knew not one iota about Floyd but Joe was delighted to frame Floyd, because with Joe’s doping positive it was of course the next logical way that Joe could gain attention. No way was Joe getting out of that Tour of Turkey positive, so by helping to frame Floyd, he was taking that doping positive and doing the best he could with it to further promote Joe, which is what Joe does 24/7. The testosterone medical experts factually refuted Joe’s testimony on the effects of testosterone as Joe utilized it at Floyd’s trial. Even in doping, Joe couldn’t get it right.

Joe does not care if people dope or not. He’s not anti doping. He’s pro Joe Papp. He’s after whatever story line he can milk to publicize himself, that’s easy to see from his various blogs and the posts in the blogs (such as where he interviews himself) and constant self injection into situations he’s not really a part of. Right now the Joe Papp shtick is to pretend he is hated because he stood up against doping. That’s not it at all. Joe is hated by people who know Joe, were tricked by Joe, were scammed by Joe, were badmouthed without reason by Joe. Joe is hated because of Joe, not for any political or policy stance he’s taken.

Since I am in the science circles, I asked friends of mine to work /pro bono/ for months to go over Joe’s lab results and help him defend his case. They made phone calls, did research, and went to all ends to pick apart the STRONG factual evidence against Joe. They found out all their work, and their professional reputations compromised by Joe when they read about Joe “flipping” in the news when Joe became a “surprise” witness against Floyd Landis. Joe Papp never notified his defense “team”
that he was going to flip. Those people were never given a statement by Joe that they could disclose to all the professional contacts they had pulled that Joe had lied to them. Why didn’t Joe inform them? Because Joe was done with them and tossed them away like a rag. That was part of an old deceased Joe Papp scam.

Joe was onto the next thing. Joe is always onto the next thing, the next false con of Joe Papp about Joe Papp. I feel really really bad for the people I asked to help on Joe’s defense. On my word they spent weeks on defending him and made fools of themselves to other professional colleagues. I let my friends down. Joe Papp lied to me again and again and again. I believed Joe and I was a fool. I feel bad for Floyd Landis. Joe helped to frame Floyd and make Floyd look dirty when Joe had not one bit of knowledge of Floyd Landis. Thanks for giving me space to write this out. I think I’ve told enough of the story. The record is there and I think it is pretty clear to anyone who cares to waste time reading it.

Best Regards,
Mike Dropkin
 

the big ring

BANNED
Jul 28, 2009
2,135
0
0
ChewbaccaD said:
Super duper uncool that cyclingnews.com might have allowed that to happen again without warning us it happened the first time(I'd heard an ugly rumor, but never heard anything else, so I figured it was blown out of proportion or something. I mean, I have defended Joe MANY times here. I even wrote a letter to the judge in his case a couple of years ago before he was sentenced telling the judge he as a nice guy...I figured I would be able to trust him), or banning him before it could happen again...really uncool...

Time to get in touch with the other 11 members of your group and give them a heads up, yes? ;)

Makes a mockery of the derision laid at the feet of this "echo chamber" when you consider people are prepared to pay for identity information, or JV outs pro riders here, or LL's try and disrupt things, or PhD holders vehemently defend specific riders / teams.
 
May 20, 2010
801
0
0
I'm puzzled by him.
He gets busted.
Rats out everyone to save his own posterior.
Turns himself into some kind of anti-doping crusader (which is complete hogwash, of course).
Then goes to work for Little Timmy Herman and His Band of Vile Obfuscators.
Sorry, but my brain doesn't work this way--can someone explain this to me?
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
TexPat said:
I'm puzzled by him.
He gets busted.
Rats out everyone to save his own posterior.
Turns himself into some kind of anti-doping crusader (which is complete hogwash, of course).
Then goes to work for Little Timmy Herman and His Band of Vile Obfuscators.
Sorry, but my brain doesn't work this way--can someone explain this to me?

Dude appears to have a rep as a long time scammer. I doubt making some extra coin by befriending someone on the Internet and selling them out to whoever will pay causes him any moral qualms at all. It sounds like it is one more scam in a long list of scams.

Posing as anti-doping advocate is just so cynical it is almost funny.
 
May 20, 2010
801
0
0
BroDeal said:
Dude has a rep as a long time scammer. I doubt making some extra coin by befriending someone on the Internet and selling them out to whoever will pay causes any moral qualms at all. One more scam in a long list of scams.

The anti-doping advocate is just so cynical.

Geez. And some people think that I am the evil one.
I really wish that I didn't know about this kind of stuff.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
the big ring said:
Time to get in touch with the other 11 members of your group and give them a heads up, yes? ;)

Makes a mockery of the derision laid at the feet of this "echo chamber" when you consider people are prepared to pay for identity information, or JV outs pro riders here, or LL's try and disrupt things, or PhD holders vehemently defend specific riders / teams.

It isn't my site. If CN was aware that something like that happened or even may have happened, they really should have done something about it I think. I don't know, maybe it's all paranoia. Like I said, it is possible I would never know if my information was given by Papp, and then used by someone associated with Lance. But certainly, if I did find out something happened, well, then I would be pretty angry.
 

the big ring

BANNED
Jul 28, 2009
2,135
0
0
http://www.businessinsider.com/joe-papp-comments-on-lance-armstrong-doping-case-2012-6

Interesting to see what Joe really thinks of Lance.

Now wondering if the "Reactions from the Pro Peloton to #USPSConspiracy (USADA)" thread - started by Joe - was an attempt to use the forum to track all pro reactions so he can report back to Lance.

To wit:

joe_papp said:
The USADA - Armstrong thread is getting dense and difficult to navigate but regardless, we need a separate place to keep track of (even limited) reaction from the pro peloton to #USPSConspiracy.

Please post the following:

1) RIDER NAME
2) QUOTE
3) Link/URL

his first contribution:

joe_papp said:
I'll start...

CHRIS HORNER

“I don’t believe Armstrong has cheated in any way to win those victories and he’s gone through an insane amount of testing. Do we have pictures of it? Video or testing? Because without that you really don’t have anything.”

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/chris-horner-i-dont-believe-armstrong-cheated

And what he wants from it:

joe_papp said:
Thanks, guys. Inspiration for this came from whomever it was who first posted about Thomas's reactions in the main USADA vs. Lance thread.

Let's keep this thread reasonably on-topic and stick to documenting the reactions from pro cyclists (and triathletes, too, and former riders, current DS's??) and providing appropriate commentary on said reactions. Want this to be a resource that's easy to access and doesn't require a lot of wading through typical Clinic in-fighting ;)



Damn. Another conspiracy. I'm in trouble again, aren't I?
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
TexPat said:
Geez. And some people think that I am the evil one.
I really wish that I didn't know about this kind of stuff.

I am really glad I know this stuff. Especially considering he sent me that PM on the day I got in my tiff with Lance. I went back and looked at the exchange on PM to see if I contacted him (I couldn't have imagined why I would have PM'd him first, but thought maybe I did as I was concerned that Lance might screw with me). Turns out that Papp PM'd me first. Here is the first PM, to wit I replied, and then received the PM I posted in my earlier post.

It's almost sad/pathetic how easily you cracked Juan Pelota. I'd congratulate you but it looks more and more like having shot fish in a barrel. To that end, while I hardly think you should apologize to the guy, it does, in a roundabout way, once again give (his) lawyers a bad name. What kind of representation are they giving him at however many $100s/hr if they're not trying to dissuade him from engaging in drunk Twitter-fights w/ another future-lawyer who's just trying to **** w/ him?
__________________
joepa

"There is a proper dignity and proportion to be observed in the performance of every act of life"

* email me
* read my (old) blog
* visit my website
* read my (new) blog

Man...
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
TexPat said:
Geez. And some people think that I am the evil one.
I really wish that I didn't know about this kind of stuff.

Didn't that snake Fabiani claim you were the evil one because of your twitter handle?

Shows what a Harvard Law degree gets you :D
 
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
the big ring said:
http://www.businessinsider.com/joe-papp-comments-on-lance-armstrong-doping-case-2012-6

Interesting to see what Joe really thinks of Lance.

Now wondering if the "Reactions from the Pro Peloton to #USPSConspiracy (USADA)" thread - started by Joe - was an attempt to use the forum to track all pro reactions so he can report back to Lance.

To wit:



his first contribution:



And what he wants from it:





Damn. Another conspiracy. I'm in trouble again, aren't I?

Under the circumstances, yours is the most reasonable - and the most likely - supposition.

Must have been hilarious, getting all these anti-doping / anti-LA Clinic denizens to compile his dossier for him.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Funny, BPC is reading (and probably posting) here. I have blocked him on twitter because he harasses me with his mentally ill tweets if I don't. He just tweeted about me having written Joe's judge a letter (something he could only have seen here b/c of that)...man, Joe selling me out, and BPC cruising intertube forums he has been banned from a million times. That Lance Armstrong really attracts quite the following, right?
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Can I ask all of you to stop using Gmail or Hotmail.

So easy to be hacked.

Many have already had emails read etc,

Just stop using them. Move to something more secure from a non-web based provider. Please.

And stop PM'ing each other personal details.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
I admit I was sucked in. I don't have an excuse because I had heard stuff about Papp before he tested positive. Lots of people who raced with him hated the guy. This was like ten years ago. Still it was easy to think that his anti-doping stance was sincere.

Funny thing is that when I heard that someone here had sold RR's info to Armstrong, I immediately guessed it was Papp.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.