I have what I think might be some objective reasons behind what seems like a lethargic response towards El Pistelero's 3rd TdF victory:
-He was a huge favorite to win the TdF before it even began. The odds for him winning were pretty sick, something like 7/4.
-His winning it again surprised almost noone. I did a pre-race questionairre with friends on who they thought would place in this year's TdF, and all 8 of them (including me) had Bertie as our #1. We were all correct.
Yawn!
-He didn't have a spectacular Stage win as he did in Stage 15 last year that showcased his exceptional talents. Something always happened in every great stage he completed to take a little glimmer off (finishing tied in time but behind Schleck in 17; The Vino/Rodriguez incident after he dropped Schleck, etc.).
-On a whole, this entire era in sports is starting to suffer from the complete domination from the same handful of people winning their respective sporting events over and over again every year. There isn't much suspense. I am a big fan of Tennis and love playing and watching the sport, but I long for the old days when there was some drama and many contenders to win a Grand Slam.
The past 7 years of seeing Roger and Rafa win 24 of the last 26 Grand Slams in Tennis is boring the hell out of me and making me lose interest in the Sport. When what is projected to happen always happens, the drama and excitement in the path towards the victory is lost.
If Alberto was setting the trend of a dominant cycler winning every year after years of parity, it might be more interesting. But since he is just the latest in a decades worth of dominance by the few in all major sports including cycling, it doesn't seem as special as it might have seemed 10 years ago.
As crazy as it sounds, if Alberto were to lose his "magic" for a year or two and then come back and win it when people had written him off, I bet the interest in his victory (and ensuing ones) and intrigue in his personality would radically increase. As it is, I think most people think he will about 5-10 TdF and we just went through an era of mechanized and suspenseless winning by an individual.
So as people only got real excited with Federer winning another Slam when he got near Sampras' record of 14, maybe the same will be true after AC wins his 6th TdF and starts threatening LA's 7 wins. Number 3 in what is expected to be at least 6 may just seem like a stepping stone in this crazy era of individual dominance.
As it is, people now expect an individual or team to win year after year after year, and when the chosen elite do what they're favored and supposed to do, it isn't something unique or new anymore. If this were to stop being the trend for awhile, and parity and competition were to become the norm, the fascination with projected and manifested domination might pick up again.