auscyclefan94 said:
[response to: And he has a perfect right to [blame the team], but he will not.]
+1...it is annoying how this has turned out.
This I am not quite getting. How are you suddenly OK with the team deserving blame?
For months we have been hearing from you how great the team was, as a team, and how supportive they were of each other. A team that would grow over time and would only get better, etc. That even if they weren't the best, they had great team spirit.
We get a totally predictable third week in the Giro, and you seem ****ed with them.
Who is letting that team spirit down now? Not Cadel. Why you?
Most of us have stated from well before the Giro that in our eyes the team was too light for the job at hand, and most of us have been stating throughout the Giro that despite the team he was on, Cadel was riding admirably. To most of us the current situation "has turned out" as expected.
We weren't stating that Cadel was "smoking" the rest of the riders like you were at one point (at least I recall something to that effect - I might be wrong), nor are we/most-of-us saying now that Cadel disappoints because at stage 19 the wheels came off a bit. I'd argue that throughout and still, supportive posts of Cadel's accomplishments appear more often than you seem to receive.
I did expect some people to rub salt in the wounds, but I did not expect you to join that gang.
"None" of us are
blaming the team, really. What you have heard were simply judgement calls they weren't up to the task and never were. Something that seems to have been a very appropriate call.
Blaming suggest they were "at fault despite capacity to do otherwise". To me, if anyone is to blame for being on a team that is too light, it is the guy who decided to move to it. IF you blame the team. Which Cadel hasn't really done so far.
I am curious what Cadel will reveal as the thing that has been troubling him since mid race, and seems to be his reason for under performing this time round (he does state that Basso is the better rider, so he is giving credit too).
But if it is true that the suggested team criticism would indeed be justified in your eyes now (even if it has been more or less absent from Cadel's lips and I suspect will stay that way), why your back flip? And why isn't the team's strength something that Cadel has brought upon himself by moving to BMC? Why blame the team and exonerate Cadel (by the sound of it)? Or am I missing something?
I am not poking, just curious. What am I missing?