The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Why does she only have 2 options? Can't she go to the bike store and try out many saddles?CarlosBom said:Hi to everyone!!
I'm posting this because my girlfriend wants to change her saddle from her road bike, but she has two options and doesn't know which one to pick.
Prologo Kappa Evo DEA T 2.0 or Prologo Nago Evo DEA Tirox
What do you think?
ray j willings said:No padding, naked carbon is the way to go, less friction no issues. The more bits that move between your bum and your saddle the more chance of getting sores/rash etc
ray j willings said:No padding, naked carbon is the way to go, less friction no issues. The more bits that move between your bum and your saddle the more chance of getting sores/rash etc
winkybiker said:ray j willings said:No padding, naked carbon is the way to go, less friction no issues. The more bits that move between your bum and your saddle the more chance of getting sores/rash etc
Then why don't the pros ride naked carbon? .......................
winkybiker said:ray j willings said:No padding, naked carbon is the way to go, less friction no issues. The more bits that move between your bum and your saddle the more chance of getting sores/rash etc
Then why don't the pros ride naked carbon? The RAAM guys don't either. Few (if any) seen on randonees. Long distance cyclo-tourists don't ride them. What is the market? If they're the best, why aren't they more common?
ray j willings said:winkybiker said:ray j willings said:No padding, naked carbon is the way to go, less friction no issues. The more bits that move between your bum and your saddle the more chance of getting sores/rash etc
Then why don't the pros ride naked carbon? The RAAM guys don't either. Few (if any) seen on randonees. Long distance cyclo-tourists don't ride them. What is the market? If they're the best, why aren't they more common?
I ride mine and don't have any issues short/ long rides. One of my friends switched to naked carbon saddle and finds it much better. He does a lot of miles and did have issues with sores. He doesn't now he's switched to naked carbon.
The carbon saddle I favour cost me about £30 from china. You can pay a fortune but I spoke to my friend Ed who is a carbon specialist and the carbon and layup on some of the cheap ones from china is no worse than some of the most expensive "name" ones you can buy.
I do think that the look of a nude carbon saddle puts people off. It looks uncomfortable but unless you try it etc .
Winky I never said they were the best. You are making a lot of assumptions and asking a lot of questions about things I never mentioned.
I can only speak from my own real experience.
cheers.
I used to use a naked carbon SLR for criteriums and short road races and loved it for the reasons you mentioned. I always preferred a padded one for training, long races and stage races though. I find that after a few hours on poorer roads the naked carbon can get a bit harsh. I'm always surprised more people aren't willing to try them.ray j willings said:Your right Winky about " way to go " . I apologise for misinterpreting your reply.
I do think the look " it don't look comfy" puts some people off.
I personally have never had an issues with any saddle padded or non padded.
I do find the nude carbon the most comfy and have been riding them for quite a few years.
I know that a lot of pro's use their fav saddle [ padded] and get them rebadged "sponsors"
I suppose you have to try one and see if it works or not.
winkybiker said:ray j willings said:No padding, naked carbon is the way to go, less friction no issues. The more bits that move between your bum and your saddle the more chance of getting sores/rash etc
Then why don't the pros ride naked carbon? The RAAM guys don't either. Few (if any) seen on randonees. Long distance cyclo-tourists don't ride them. What is the market? If they're the best, why aren't they more common?
Bustedknuckle said:winkybiker said:Then why don't the pros ride naked carbon? The RAAM guys don't either. Few (if any) seen on randonees. Long distance cyclo-tourists don't ride them. What is the market? If they're the best, why aren't they more common?ray j willings said:No padding, naked carbon is the way to go, less friction no issues. The more bits that move between your bum and your saddle the more chance of getting sores/rash etc
They aren't 'the best', they are the lightest, which for some, makes it 'the best'. Even if it isn't.
For the OP, try to find a SMP saddle test LBS and try one.
ray j willings said:Busted ...I know you don't like me but please don't make things up and presume what I think or say or just make up what you think I might say.
I never actually said the" lightest saddle in existence is the best " Your making a presumption. "You are wrong"
Did you read the above post, if you did then your presumption is way off ,,,,miles away. I ride a £20 saddle. How much does your saddle cost?
If your friend is using zip ties to mount his garmin and it works " that's a good idea then" What's your problem?
There are plenty of super light saddles all sorts of shapes even padded ones well under 100grms. You could pass on that information to him if he's riding around with a sore bottom. He could try TUNE. Mcfk .AX Lightness.
Smud or even get Berk to make him a custom one. There's plenty of options I think Dash and Becker make the most expensive saddles .I think one Becker saddle comes in around 40 grms. 40grms I should buy it![]()
I'm sure he will get one that suits him.
all the best Ray J