Not really because he doesn't have his stomp anymore. There are other riders faster than him.
We'll see.
Not really because he doesn't have his stomp anymore. There are other riders faster than him.
If the burden is much higher, it's easier to share it over multiple people.Everyone will be doing less watts, and so the watts required to ride away will be less.
We have seen this. All season long. If you really want Roglic to have a shot at winning the WC RR, then he has to attack like Alaphilippe did in Quebec.We'll see.
Have you seen the audience data in France in the races where Pogacar has wone easy lik Dauphine and TDF? Record this year. I posted it on the previous page.A survey was conducted in France last year, just after Il Lombardia, on Pogacar's image. Of course, it was only a small survey, conducted at a time that undoubtedly corresponded to a peak in the battle between the pro- and anti-Pogacar camps.
The poll revealed that if 75% of cycling fans (who make up the population of this forum) appreciate him, 60% believe that his dominance detracts from the interest in the races he participates in.
It may not be a huge majority, but it is certainly a clear majority.
Well, the poll also revealed that 54% of cycling fans would belong to the clinic section of this forum.
These are numbers. Better than assuming.
Here is a link for those interested (in French)
A poll isn't theory, it's data.The reality is that the data doesn't support that theory.
We have seen this. All season long. If you really want Roglic to have a shot at winning the WC RR, then he has to attack like Alaphilippe did in Quebec.
I don't get where you get your sources from. The first week of the TDF had a lot less viewers than normally. While the second week was more stabilised.Have you seen the audience data in France in the races where Pogacar has wone easy lik Dauphine and TDF? Record this year. I posted it on the previous page.
Well, duh, the first week also didn‘t have mountain stages. It did have more exciting parts than the GC battle later on, but a lot of casual cycling viewers won‘t watch less decisive stages. Or maybe it got so low viewing numbers because Pogačar wasn‘t winning by minutes. Would be an interesting twist.I don't get where you get your sources from. The first week of the TDF had a lot less viewers than normally. While the second week was more stabilised.
![]()
Verontrustend: Wereldwijde daling van de tv-kijkcijfers in de Tour de France
Ontdek waarom de tv-kijkcijfers van de Tour de France wereldwijd dalen. Lees onze diepgaande analyse en blijf op de hoogte van wielernieuws. Bekijk nu!www.wielerflits.nl
Not sure what’s so “duh” about it. Are Pogacar fans the only ones watching cycling? Because that first week was very exciting.Well, duh, the first week also didn‘t have mountain stages. It did have more exciting parts than the GC battle later on, but a lot of casual cycling viewers won‘t watch less decisive stages. Or maybe it got so low viewing numbers because Pogačar wasn‘t winning by minutes. Would be an interesting twist.
Last year the route was much more conducive to a chase. And still a 100km attack worked, despite the fact that he attacked when the peloton was still really big and he had basically a full peloton chasing him for at least the first lap.
A similar attack at similar forms would lead to terminal G2 syndrome instantly on the Kigali route, and if they sat on domestiques that DNF'd Zurich with 3 laps to go they would ship multiple minutes super quickly
Overall numbers were much better than 2024 : https://www.francetelevisions.fr/gr...r-de-france-2025-une-edition-historique-46087.I don't get where you get your sources from. The first week of the TDF had a lot less viewers than normally. While the second week was more stabilised.
![]()
Verontrustend: Wereldwijde daling van de tv-kijkcijfers in de Tour de France
Ontdek waarom de tv-kijkcijfers van de Tour de France wereldwijd dalen. Lees onze diepgaande analyse en blijf op de hoogte van wielernieuws. Bekijk nu!www.wielerflits.nl
Montreal says hi.Pogacar was absurdly strong last autumn: from WC to Lombardy. I am not sure he will have this level this time to try crazy stuff plus his confidence should be dented a bit.
Montreal says hi.
There's several dozen data points to suggest he's gonna destroy everyone, and only the time trial says otherwise. It makes no sense to me people are putting so much stock in that time trial.
I am not saying he wont win, just that his attack will be considerably later this time. It was an anomaly and not the best tactic.
In France. My source talks about globallyOverall numbers were much better than 2024 : https://www.francetelevisions.fr/gr...r-de-france-2025-une-edition-historique-46087.
I mean if Pogi won't go then Rogla will.
Pretty impressive to tank ratings when last year had the Euro'sIn France. My source talks about globally
If Hermans or Van Wilder doesn't join them, Belgium made a tactical mistakeRogla will go early as a bait. Belgians and co will chase him down and then Pogi will strike deadly 2-3 laps to go. Rogla will be an important part of the rainbow campaign!
Rogla will go early as a bait. Belgians and co will chase him down and then Pogi will strike deadly 2-3 laps to go. Rogla will be an important part of the rainbow campaign!
If Hermans or Van Wilder doesn't join them, Belgium made a tactical mistake
Would make the most sense to me. That Pogacar just joins those early attacks, or bridges once he notices that important riders are part of it. Just not sure how those riders would then react.Maybe you are right but its not just 2 nations. Maybe other teams will chase as well. Its also possible that the forming breakaway is too strong for Pogs liking and he decides to join ( Evenepoel will have to react as well).
Yeah your figures are for France. Mine are global. Cheers.@Berniece
Where did I get this news from? From the company that broadcasts those races in France.
I don't think what a Dutch media outlet says is more reliable than what the French company that broadcasts the race in France says.![]()
@Berniece
Where did I get this news from? From the company that broadcasts those races in France.
I don't think what a Dutch media outlet says is more reliable than what the French company that broadcasts the race in France says.
And for Paris-Roubaix, the rating in't even necessary. This interest in the preview of the race hasn´t been seen in years. But if you look at the audiencias figures, confirm a historic increase.
There's no point in arguing about something for which there's data. No matter how much you don't like a cyclist, it's refuting objective data.
View: https://x.com/francetvpro/status/1934525021046669769