World Politics

Page 163 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Oncearunner8

BANNED
Dec 10, 2009
312
0
0
Moose McKnuckles said:
"social/socialist" agendas? Do you understand the difference? Further what exactly is the problem with advocating some socialist policies? I'd bet a large proportion of the Teabaggers already take advantage of these policies. To what policies exactly are you opposed?

I think I can understand your and my difference of opinions, and if you do not like my use of the term social and socialist agendas then to bad.

I am not worried with the Tea Party. I am also not worried with President Obama’s Social / Socialist policies. Where in my post did you see opposition?
 

Oncearunner8

BANNED
Dec 10, 2009
312
0
0
Moose McKnuckles said:
When you're sporting a Hitler avatar, you're not coming here to converse. You're coming to show the world that you're five cans short of a six-pack.

I asked this before and Hugh told be to stop the crack.

With ravens avatar? What do you mean Hitler? I only ever saw a avatar that showed President Obama in like a joker colors or something like that?
 
Oncearunner8 said:
I think I can understand your and my difference of opinions, and if you do not like my use of the term social and socialist agendas then to bad.

I am not worried with the Tea Party. I am also not worried with President Obama’s Social / Socialist policies. Where in my post did you see opposition?

I was only asking what exactly you mean by social/socialist? Those two words are not the same.
 

Oncearunner8

BANNED
Dec 10, 2009
312
0
0
ChrisE said:
Maybe you should look in the mirror.

If you would have open dialogue instead of marching with Swastika logos and nazi tattoos, you wouldn't be laid up right now with a black foot broken off in your a$$.

It was another “socialist” called group that showed up for the smack down. Mainly Latin folks who had their mad face invasion on, maybe a Mexican gave him a Tijuana Donkey show.
 

Oncearunner8

BANNED
Dec 10, 2009
312
0
0
Moose McKnuckles said:
I was only asking what exactly you mean by social/socialist? Those two words are not the same.

for some reason I have heard people refer to President Obamas Social agenda. Maybe I am dreaming. His Social life is not my concern. Nor is his Socialist ideas.

So I understand what your pointing out. I am wrong your correct.

Cool it Camel Toe! :eek:
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,966
1,391
20,680
Oncearunner8 said:
I asked this before and Hugh told be to stop the crack.

With ravens avatar? What do you mean Hitler? I only ever saw a avatar that showed President Obama in like a joker colors or something like that?

When ravens had his little temper tantrum because somebody had the nerve to complain that his Obama avatar violated the "no political statements in avatars" policy he briefly put up a Hitler face version of the picture, which I think he got from his Grand Visier.
 

Oncearunner8

BANNED
Dec 10, 2009
312
0
0
Hugh Januss said:
When ravens had his little temper tantrum because somebody had the nerve to complain that his Obama avatar violated the "no political statements in avatars" policy he briefly put up a Hitler face version of the picture, which I think he got from his Grand Visier.



Oh ok. I understand now.

I went to the post office around the New Year time frame. I really do not know what the day was but it was in Jan 2010. When I drove up I noticed across the street there was some tables set up with posters on them and people with clip boards. I figured some time of petition. When I walked up the entrance there was a man with some papers and clipboards with a poster sign draped over his neck (poster on the front and back of his torso) It was a poster of President Obama with a Hitler mustache photo shopped on. I was curious who the people were that had the balls to do such a thing. I walked up to the guy and he gave me the Larouche PAC spill. It made me mad as an American that this group openly defamed the President of the United States.


Another similar event happened to me with email. Without getting to deep into what I do for a living (take other countries Natural Resources) I receive quite a bit of what I like to call SPAM and other stupid nonsense. Every once and a while I receive something that sets me off, a few weeks ago I received an email from someone titled “First low flight over Texas”. It was a picture of Air force One and it had Bullet holes photo shopped into it. That picture made me so angry, because I take that as not only disrespect but a threat to the President of the United States. I do not like to joke on these types of matters. It may be funny for some but I take it seriously.

I did not vote for the President but I support the Office and his job. I do not have to like his policies but that does not make me correct either. I give him his due to run this country and I hope he does a good job because there are many items to address during his term.
 
Oncearunner8 said:
The Confederate states lost. Thank goodness for that. The USA would not exist and so many good things about this country would have been lost.

I have a hard time connecting the entire Tea Party with white racist. Your really a tired Hack if you have to spit out some article word for word. Do you have any personal take on this? Where did the article end and your opinion begin?

I was paraphrasing, couldn't you tell? I forgot, your lot is so serious and afraid of everything, literally everything.
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
Hugh Januss said:
Political opinion primer.
If one person disagrees with your point of view, that makes that person an idiot.
If everyone disagrees with your point of view does that make you the idiot? Oh hell no, that makes them all intolerant.:D

it becomes intolerance when they beat the crap out of you
 
Mar 10, 2009
7,268
1
0
I was torn whether to post it here or in the other thread... Just came across this little document:

S.Res 222 109-1

Glad they keep busy and pleasantly surprised it didn't get filibustered...
 

r.avens

BANNED
Apr 16, 2010
70
0
0
GM is paying back Uncle Sam to shake him down for more money.

Fairy tales can come true, it can happen to you
If you're young at heart.
For it's hard, you will find, to be narrow of mind
If you're young at heart.

You can go to extremes with impossible schemes.
You can laugh when your dreams fall apart at the seams.
And life gets more exciting with each passing day.
And love is either in your heart, or on it's way.

:)

http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/23/ge...-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia_print.html
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
A

Anonymous

Guest
It is so easy to sit back and say "The government shouldn't have bailed out anyone" when they already did. See, we don't have to live in a world where the financial system collapsed because of the complete failure of the banking system. We don't have to recover from the massive failures in the automotive industry because of the failure of two of our countries automobile manufacturers. No, we now have an economy that is far from recovered, but FAR better than it would have been if left to the "just do nothing and let the invisible hand of the market take care of it" crowd. When market failures (the ignorant idea that this was a government failure has been dispelled for anyone with even a modicum of understanding regarding the collapse of the mortgage industry) cause instability to the point of eminent collapse, someone has to step in. All of the Adam Smith disciples in the world will never convince me that their method is superior to the collective knowledge of all of the major industrialized nations on the planet. Again, you have no real world examples of your theory at work in these instances. The Heritage Foundation and CATO institute can write all of the ivory tower ideas they want regarding the effect of government intervention in times of severe financial crisis, but they still have no example of any government of any major industrialized nation doing anything different than did we. The financial situation faced by Reagan was a kids game compared to the one faced by our government at the end of the Bush administration and the beginning of the Obama administration.

Throw all the barbs you want from the cheap seats, but the party of "no" is going to get their chance to affect government in a real way pretty soon. I am guessing that it will not take long for them to cave in to their principles just like they did during the 6 years they held sway in our most recent past. Even they know their rhetoric is unworkable within the REALITY of our system. Snake oil salesman to the rescue!!!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
r.avens said:
Fairy tales can come true, it can happen to you
If you're young at heart.
For it's hard, you will find, to be narrow of mind
If you're young at heart.

You can go to extremes with impossible schemes.
You can laugh when your dreams fall apart at the seams.
And life gets more exciting with each passing day.
And love is either in your heart, or on it's way.

:)

http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/23/ge...-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia_print.html

The new definition of 'creative financing'. The funny thing is no one cares. Our govt is as corrupt as it is inept. This was payola for the UAW. Nothing more, nothing less.

Cool man.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Scott SoCal said:
The new definition of 'creative financing'. The funny thing is no one cares. Our govt is as corrupt as it is inept. This was payola for the UAW. Nothing more, nothing less.

Cool man.

Glad you decided to post here again. This place was getting boring.

Now if you want to discount the fact that MANY businesses would have gone under if GM and Chrysler had been allowed to fail, go ahead. The fact is that this was not anything like payola for the UAW. It was to keep businesses like Monroe Truck Bodies, Omaha Standard, Knapeheide, and hundreds and probably thousands of medium to small sized businesses from failing also.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Are you guys really ignorant of the reality of the effect letting them fail would have had on our economy? Seriously, the list of companies that would not have survived is incredibly long. It is almost like you believe the effects of such a failure to be benign. The failure of that system would have been devastating beyond comprehension. If we had done things the way of the party of "NO," most of us would be scratching for food today. There is no market in the absence of capital. Again, the theory that markets run better un-regulated is fanciful ivory tower economics. It is also one that Republicans can tout with reverence and moral certainty because their MO is to talk one way and spend like a bipolar man in the throes of mania in practice.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Thoughtforfood said:
Glad you decided to post here again. This place was getting boring.

Now if you want to discount the fact that MANY businesses would have gone under if GM and Chrysler had been allowed to fail, go ahead. The fact is that this was not anything like payola for the UAW. It was to keep businesses like Monroe Truck Bodies, Omaha Standard, Knapeheide, and hundreds and probably thousands of medium to small sized businesses from failing also.

Thanks. Bored in a London airport... That and Lib on Lib arguments can be sooo bland.

I don't like the too big to fail argument. Capitalism is why the buggy whip industry no longer works.. GM needed to fail cuz their structure is not viable. It won't be viable 5 years from now either. Then what?

Eh, who cares?.. Nothing I can do about it and I'm not gonna get excited about it. This article would have stunned me 10 years ago. Now it's not even an eyebrow raiser.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Scott SoCal said:
Thanks. Bored in a London airport... That and Lib on Lib arguments can be sooo bland.

I don't like the too big to fail argument. Capitalism is why the buggy whip industry no longer works.. GM needed to fail cuz their structure is not viable. It won't be viable 5 years from now either. Then what?

Eh, who cares?.. Nothing I can do about it and I'm not gonna get excited about it. This article would have stunned me 10 years ago. Now it's not even an eyebrow raiser.

Yea, the sound of one hand clapping is never very satisfying. Got stuck because of F[aafwe8aafje4wa3wq- uae w;ae ajf volcano ash?
 
Mar 19, 2009
2,703
3
0
I wonder when small biz is going to get a break from the banks. :confused: I have awesome credit, very little debt vs. income, tons of collateral, and I can't even get a 10k loan from my bank to invest into the carbon wing of my bike wheel company, which isn't much of a starting inventory for something like that. Is there some kind of freeze on small biz loans? I couldn't get a straight answer from my banker, just "no, not at this time, nobody's getting anything". Before the fiscally conservative Conservatives just about single-handedly killed our economy, a 10k loan to small biz was standard issue. What's going on?
 
Jul 23, 2009
1,120
2
0
Thoughtforfood said:
It is so easy to sit back and say "The government shouldn't have bailed out anyone" when they already did. See, we don't have to live in a world where the financial system collapsed because of the complete failure of the banking system. We don't have to recover from the massive failures in the automotive industry because of the failure of two of our countries automobile manufacturers. No, we now have an economy that is far from recovered, but FAR better than it would have been if left to the "just do nothing and let the invisible hand of the market take care of it" crowd. When market failures (the ignorant idea that this was a government failure has been dispelled for anyone with even a modicum of understanding regarding the collapse of the mortgage industry) cause instability to the point of eminent collapse, someone has to step in. All of the Adam Smith disciples in the world will never convince me that their method is superior to the collective knowledge of all of the major industrialized nations on the planet. Again, you have no real world examples of your theory at work in these instances. The Heritage Foundation and CATO institute can write all of the ivory tower ideas they want regarding the effect of government intervention in times of severe financial crisis, but they still have no example of any government of any major industrialized nation doing anything different than did we. The financial situation faced by Reagan was a kids game compared to the one faced by our government at the end of the Bush administration and the beginning of the Obama administration.

Throw all the barbs you want from the cheap seats, but the party of "no" is going to get their chance to affect government in a real way pretty soon. I am guessing that it will not take long for them to cave in to their principles just like they did during the 6 years they held sway in our most recent past. Even they know their rhetoric is unworkable within the REALITY of our system. Snake oil salesman to the rescue!!!

While I agree that the economy would currently be in the grave had GM or the banking system completely collapsed, I suspect that we have passed the inevitable down a few years - kind of a live for today mentality (but then again, ostriches with their heads in the sand are probably happier than the zebra who see the lion coming with his claws out).
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
CentralCaliBike said:
While I agree that the economy would currently be in the grave had GM or the banking system completely collapsed, I suspect that we have passed the inevitable down a few years - kind of a live for today mentality (but then again, ostriches with their heads in the sand are probably happier than the zebra who see the lion coming with his claws out).

With a total collapse of the banking system, and the disappearance of the paper wealth that exists on the planet, I think we could have seen more than a few years. From what I have read, that was the real fear. You domino all of the institutions, and there is no place to go to get your money regardless of who you are, and even if you took it out in cash, you have worthless paper for the most part because it isn't based on any real asset. It is based on imagined wealth, not gold or anything else. I had this discussion with a friend who is a very conservative financial adviser, and he was very adamant about the fact that it was a bad idea that we had no choice but to make in terms of TARP. As for the auto industry, I agree that it was a "treat the symptoms, not the disease" effort, but sometimes that is the right thing to do.

Either way, we appear to be climbing out.
 
May 18, 2009
3,757
0
0
RDV4ROUBAIX said:
I wonder when small biz is going to get a break from the banks. :confused: I have awesome credit, very little debt vs. income, tons of collateral, and I can't even get a 10k loan from my bank to invest into the carbon wing of my bike wheel company, which isn't much of a starting inventory for something like that. Is there some kind of freeze on small biz loans? I couldn't get a straight answer from my banker, just "no, not at this time, nobody's getting anything". Before the fiscally conservative Conservatives just about single-handedly killed our economy, a 10k loan to small biz was standard issue. What's going on?

Are you black? My conservative buddies say the mortgage industry crashed because the govt made these altruistic banks lend money to black people. I doubt if they have corrected this law yet because Obama is part black, so if you are you may be in luck.

Don't believe all the liberal media spin about Goldman Sachs, etc. This is the cause of the problem.

On another note, I am looking forward those redneck, errrrrr, southern pride infested/secessionist states along the norther Gulf of Mexico to refuse any federal assistance to keep that oil spill offshore, or to clean up afterwards. The federal government that is on the road to communism is not the answer.

Just tune into Rush and he can enlighten you on these issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts