Alpe d'Huez said:
Excellent links there Chris. Very telling and true. You're dead right in your post, only that you left out the obvious, that the money has so infested the government, the only barrier left are a few judges like Rakoff, who are in a position that is very difficult to buy off.
I was on an airplane last week and sat next to a businessman who co-owned an IT firm. Not a huge firm, but he did a mix of work for private and government agencies. He noted that as far as he can tell, from all of his interaction with government players over the last decade plus, the entire system is completely corrupted with money. He said there were perhaps 1 or 2 politicians he had come across whose principles were not completely influenced and compromised by money and lobbying. Both parties, all levels of government. And the influence wasn't just the politician, it bled all the way through their staff, and their actions and behavior.
Your conversation reminds me the article awhile back of that republican staffer that went rogue and quit the party, with his tell all article about the sole drive of that party: protecting the rich and monied interests, at the expense of society as a whole.
The only problem with this philosophy is that eventually it will crash; the rich make up such a little portion of the population that the buying power of the vast majority will not be able to function and sustain it. I would think eventually a sane backlash will emerge, unlike the bigotted makeup of the tea party blaming others for their plight instead of the politicians their bigotted azzes got duped into voting for. Or, the OWS who are occupying the wrong thing; wall street plays within the rules it is given, and those rules were given to them by both parties, and enforced by neither party. OWS should put forth their effort into electing or starting a 3rd party that corrects these problems instead of a "movement" easily ridiculed by the corporate media, showing people shytting in parks. The change of media ownership in this country is another thing that has contributed to this, but I really blame people for not seeing thru the BS on that issue. You and I can do it, why can't anybody else?
BTW, guess which president signed into law media deregulation? I bet red has selective memory loss on that one.
Until $ is removed from the political process none of this will change. The supreme court just ruled corps are "people" I believe. The infestation of the court system is another thing I forgot to mention that has helped create the result we are now seeing. You allude that there are thankfully still some that are independent enough to object.
This took a long time coming, and it will not easily be undone because the types of things we are discussing here are lost on the ignorant (willfully, IMO) masses. These issues are like Calculus 3 to the redneck down the street, or the party blind left wing whackjobs like red.
When stupid people believe the mortgage issue is caused by the govt making these companies give loans to minorities (Limbaugh talk), then there is a problem. When people like red are so quick to blame Delay, etc. (yes, they are to blame, but not completely), while ignoring the people that helped perpetrate this whole mess that are on this president's economic staff, then we have a problem. It is much easier to hate and be a useful idiot than stepping back and analyzing/understanding the situation and the causes behind it.
Wash, rinse, repeat when people like this have a vote that can cancel out a vote of a sane person. There are alot more of these people than there are sane people, and even when these idiots are getting kicked in the gutter they are still slow to understand the reason. Like I say, eventually I think change may come but we are dealing with very large quantities of dumbazzes in this country. Remember the old saying: "Beware of idiots in large volumes". This will take time, unless "we" elect some religious nut to cause WWIII in the name of their cloud buddy. Then, it won't matter.