- Dec 7, 2010
- 8,770
- 3
- 0
The Hitch said:Putin fanboys crawling under a rock as litvinienko trial here gets under way.
I read on here that some call putin a drunken russian. He is more like a Oprichnina.
The Hitch said:Putin fanboys crawling under a rock as litvinienko trial here gets under way.
blutto said:....a correct assessment?....wild eyed propaganda?....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?Panic in Kiev: Ukrainian forces surrender Donbass?
International observers report of growing panic in Kiev in connection with the successful counteroffensive of the separatists near Donbass.
Over a week of fighting the partisans have delivered a heavy blow to the Ukrainian forces. The group of Ukrainian fighters in Donbas suffered huge losses, the soldiers are demoralized, the officers are confused and unable to control the situation.
Ukrainian military leadership is seriously concerned of a new encirclement near Debaltsevo, as well as in other areas.
The situation is made worse by the fact that army and national guard reserves are almost completely depleted, and plugging the gaps in defense using small formations canoot stabilize the front. Besides, the Ukrainian forces are running low on ordnance, food and medical supplies.
In turn, the partisan field commanders report 752 killed Ukrainian military personnel, 59 destroyed tanks and a large number of people taken prisoner. In view of their combat successes, the partisans are refusing to take part in any further negotiations in the format of the Minsk agreements and threaten to continue the counterattack.
Local authorities in Ukrainian-controlled districts near the front report that Ukrainian soldiers are deserting with their weapons and taking to looting the countryside in increasing numbers.
In this critical situation the military is afraid to report to president Poroshenko the real situation in the southeast of the country, hiding from him the full scale of the catastrophe.
The head of state is still convinced that the situation is under control, and hopes that in case of a real threat he will still have the chance to ask the West for help.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...or proof that beyond a bunch of corrupt oligarchs and their camp followers, as well as some rabid nationalistic Nazis the populace ( which includes the common soldiers in the Ukrainian army ) of The Ukraine simply has no faith in the Kiev regime and does not support them or their putsch?...
Cheers
Buffalo Soldier said:Since it uses Christine Maggiore as it's main expert: no, it isn't.
edit: of course this is no science, it is a documentary, which never is science.
Alpe d'Huez said:Thanks for the clarity.
Good posts. Interesting situation.
Rhub's post about the how's and why's and relentless suffering under austerity in Greece very informative. I too am very curious to see how well this plays out.
Recall that when Bolivia elected a far-left Evo Morales, the country turned around dramatically in a positive way, though it took a few years. Will this happen to Greece? Or are the factions too split, the debt too deep?
rhubroma said:I think, Alpe, what's going to happen entirely depends on how much the loaning institutions are willing to concede Greece.
Retro's link to Greek economist and now economic minister, Yanis Varoufakis, was very interesting. It made me think just how much the laws of finance and banking are no more of course than profit driven human inventions. In other words they are not divine and nonnegotiable, or at least they are nonnegotiable only in so far as the strong powers of finance and banking can exact the necessary pressure to bear in subjugating all those who oppose their will. I'm not, however, so naive as to not realize that within acceptable parameters profiting on loans, and the responsible honoring of repayment are themselves necessary components of civil coexistance: in short, being in a civilized society. However, when it becomes pure usury and effectively punitive then the civilized component is replaced by tyranny.
It must thus always be recalled that these institutions are human, that like humans they can be ruthless, stubborn and implacable (especially given that money dealing is their very nature). Yet it simply isn't moral that an entire country, no matter what circumstances brought it there, can go into default: which means a humanitarian crisis, beyond a social crisis and even before being a financial and economic travesty. The strong powers, however, if left unchallenged, might actually accept the humanitarian crisis just to get every cent the terms of finance says they have coming to them. Naturally this is immoral however, which was Varoufakis' most cogent point.
Let us, therefore, remember that after WWI Germany was on the brink of such crises imposed by the intransigence of a vindictive, however comprehensible, political-financial order of the victors; but all this produced was the rise of a psychopath and the Nazi regime that brought Europe and the world into an even more catastrophic war. For this reason Germany was wisely treated differently in 1953, even if there were even greater cause for outrage and bitterness. That clemency has kept Europe basically at peace, however, ever since.
The point is that the system needs a governance to work, but such rules and terms of repayment should never become instruments of tyranny or oppression.
The Greece dilemma is putting to the test a model of civilization, for which if the humanitarian crisis is allowed to happen, just to permit the lenders full recuperation (principle and interest) of their loans (which are really investments); then it will be the model of civilization itself that will have failed.
If that happens it is impossible to say what the consequences will be, though any time a question of morality is placed in crisis, the results have never been historically fortuitous that's for certain.
RetroActive said:Alexis Tsipras' Open Letter To Germany: What You Were Never Told About Greece
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-...germany-what-you-were-never-told-about-greece
I haven't really been following Alexis Tsipras or Syriza too much but I've been listening to Yanis Varoufakis for a few years and these words aren't new. So now this message has a platform and microphone, could be interesting. Will the markets crush them though?
Anyway, many of the questions that you folks are asking have been posed, and contemplated out loud by Varoufakis for years. I see he's being dubbed 'Dr. Doom' by the press: deal with reality and you're too grim, delusion is still the best cure apparently.
Yanis Varoufakis: Confessions of an Erratic Marxist /// 14th May 2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3uNIgDmqwI
He's always sounded like a reasonable fellow to me, a pragmatist with a quick wit.
Alpe d'Huez said:I like the way Tsipiras refers to his plan for a New Deal for Greece. Interesting choice of term.
I think the situation in Greece has really turned some macro economic thinking on it's head about what is the value of goods produced and services rendered, versus the amount of actual debt heaped on them, while considering people's lifestyles. For example, one could argue that if they had just stuck with austerity, they would have dug their way out of the hole they were in, eventually, which means it could take decades, where millions of people live in misery waiting for a day they'd never see.
roundabout said:Let's see what lifestyle they can live without having to rely on unsustainable borrowing from the "ruthless and immoral" financial powers.
blutto said:...is interesting to see what that "unsustainable borrowing" was spent on....military procurement was a biggie, such that in the period leading up to the crash Greece was one highest spending countries in per capita spending on military goods...it was borrowed by a hopelessly corrupt government who took money from lenders who either didn't do their homework or didn't care because they had the leverage to make someone pay, Greece, the EU, Germany, France....
...btw given the way the negotiations on dealing with the original financial issue went with them thar financial powers it could easily be called "ruthless and immoral" ( read the lenders weren't your friendly neighborhood bank but rather some rather odious vulture capitalists who used the threat of major disruptions to the derivatives market to help force the settlement they got....btw didn't dream this up as this came from a CBC radio documentary on the issue )...think of the way CEREBRUS played GM into a potential bankruptcy thru their control of GMAC in order to get a handout from the US government....
Cheers
roundabout said:Sorry, but overblown military spending doesn't push the debt to 200% of GDP.
It also must be bad luck to have over 30 years of hopelessly corrupt governments and not being able to do a thing about it.
But nice try.
roundabout said:It also must be bad luck to have over 30 years of hopelessly corrupt governments and not being able to do a thing about it.
roundabout said:Sorry, but overblown military spending doesn't push the debt to 200% of GDP.
It also must be bad luck to have over 30 years of hopelessly corrupt governments and not being able to do a thing about it.
But nice try.
roundabout said:Let's see what lifestyle they can live without having to rely on unsustainable borrowing from the "ruthless and immoral" financial powers.
http://www.dw.de/greece-tallies-up-...bill/a-18224874?maca=en-rss-en-world-4025-rdfThe Nazis used the money to finance the their occupation of Greece as well as military operations. The loan was never repaid.
blutto said:New Greek Government Has Deep, Long-Standing Ties With Russian 'Fascist' Dugin
blutto said:....so are right it doesn't but it was a fair proportion of some rather stupid spending over some years....but lets get back to the salient point which is how a proper loan system works...in a smart legitimate transaction money is loaned with the expectation of it being paid back, it not just thrown at anyone with an open hand....surely to gawd somewhere in a system that loaned billions and billions of dollars there should have some sober sensible adult who looked at the books and said "Hey we would be stupid to give these guys money because they don't have a prayer to give it back" .....
...and one would think that if, as you state, it was known that the Greek government had been hopelessly corrupt for 30 years why on earth would a lender throw huge money at a situation that everyone knew was hopeless....you may want to follow the money on this one, as in who spent it, and who ultimately paid it back...
Cheers
ScienceIsCool said:I recommend "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" as an eye opener about how and why these things happen. Basically, countries are set up with enormous debt so that they can be looted when they collapse. The icing on the cake is that the banks making the loans often get a nice bailout. In Greece's case, I've heard Goldman Sachs helped hide the extent of the debt problem so that the loans could keep flowing...
John Swanson
blutto said:...at least try get your facts straight, the Greek debt has never reached 200% ( it peaked last year at 175% and this after years of having its economy hammered by austerity measures )....in fact just prior to the crisis and the imposition of austerity it was very close to what the US is now ( 109% to 101% )....
Cheers
