blackcat said:
but you cant divorce "Shock and Awe" from this confected battle. The provocation has context. The US and their allies in central asia and the middle east.
Then, only then, lets have this fight over satire in the press, without outside influence. Then mock the prophet.
Mock the prophet now, I will approve of the right to cartoon the image of the prophet, but i wont allow you to whitewash the context as tabula rasa. uhah, no its not tabula rasa.
I don't believe there are many here who would place in doubt the rallying effects on jihad that the quixotic "Shock and Awe" campaign had in furthering the cause of the so-called Clash. However, to suggest that
Charlie Hebdo was another weapon in that arsenal is misguided.
It is a domestic affair, purely a response to the fanatical Islamic matrix within France itself, the fruit of a not fortuitous Alegerian (and N. African) colonialism to which, if anything, Michel Houellebecq's
Soumission that envisions France being ruled by a Muslim in 2022 is a corollary phenomenon.
The books release was promoted on the last cover of C.H., but has been removed. His publisher’s offices were evacuated shortly after the shootings at Charlie Hebdo and placed under police protection amid fears that France’s enfant terrible may be on a terrorist hitlist. Houellebecq has in the past described Islam as the “stupidest” religion. Wednesday’s Charlie Hebdo ran a caricature of the novelist on the cover, showing the famously mumbling chain-smoker saying: “In 2015 I lose my teeth, in 2022 I’ll do Ramadan.”