ChrisE said:
Interesting, and I will tell you why.
I have neither the time nor inclination to go out and work and promote a 3rd party candidate. I have learned to work within the current system.
By continuing to vote for either of these two inept corrupted choices, you are endorsing the status quo. If people start staying away in droves, it would provide incentive for the parties to either change or for a 3rd party to arise.
You are condoning that which you abhor, but at least you are not a dupe or a useful idiot. You just hold your nose when you vote, but that is the problem.
Somebody said at least some nut would not have their finger on the nuclear button if a Dem was in the whitehouse. I do agree with that, and that is the only thing that makes me re-evaluate my position. But, with the stupid electoral college never being abolished, and me living in Texas, then that doesn't mean my vote is worth a whole lot, does it? If I lived in Ohio or Florida that might bother me a little more, though my basic premise of condoning what the parties do by continually voting for them would still be true.
That there are no other options besides what we actually get to choose between, merely demonstrates how the interests of some have been completely successful in dominating the system; by establishing the boundaries of a political/economic and social agenda and hence the very parameters of our democracy - beyond which, at least under the present regime, it is impossible to reach.
You speak of not condoning what the parties do by voting. This is actually a pretty good way of looking at it and, therefore, I really couldn't criticize you for such suffrage abstinence. At the same time it only speaks of how depressing and disgustingly awful the state of affairs has in fact become.
Apart from this the average citizen is often simply too distracted and/or lazy to really get informed on all the political, economic and social issues, while there is little to encourage them to do so in the consumeristic and mass media driven culture. Such baseness is appalling though. I mean if the democracy, for the reason cited above, has become so established in setting the nation's modus vivendi, such that there truly requires an Olympian effort for one to even attempt to work beyond the current system: what does this say about our state? And most people either don't have the time for it, or else couldn't care less to be honest, which is basically contemptible. Whereas, bogged down in the political morass, you just seem to have become discouraged and, more or less out of selfishness, decided to give up. But this is difficult to blame you for.
So the fact that we can't even hold contemptible a position which in a democracy neither reason nor argument should rationally justify, is a terrible sign that both the people and the political class have not demonstrated themselves to be very worthy of it. While those in control from the executive offices get to reap all the benefits from seeing their objectives realized, which is tragic really and lamentable.
It's almost as if we need to first go into rehab from this democracy and detoxify ourselves from its noxious effluvium, to be capable of making the changes we desire. We first have to go on hiatus from the putrified stench that has made the air unbreathable and which of course is slowly killing us, then finally breath new, fresh, good-scented air that reinvigorates the body and the mind, to be able to let the old go out and allow the new to come in.
Unfortunately this is generally beyond the people, for which the stale air that's lethal to them and that will eventually extinguish them is not much cause to necessary escape, and they are actually quite content to allow it to accompany them all the way to the grave, even if that means surrendering their lives to it which they unhesitatingly do and so make a complete and utter sham of democracy as is plain to see.