- Jul 16, 2010
- 17,455
- 5
- 0
Bumeington said:Can we have some objectivity please? Given that the first mass produced mountain bike came out in 1981 I think it's unreasonable to hold lack of MTB palmares against the likes of Merckx, besides he has plenty of cyclo-cross wins, so your point is moot.
Fact is 24 cyclists in history have won more GTs than Evans, so it's a bit ridiculous to skip him above not only all the riders with 1 GT win, but also all but 5 or 6 of those with more GTs than him on the basis of a world championship win and some MTB?!?!? He hasn't even won a monument, not that that's anything to be ashamed of but he is clearly not in the top 10 cyclists of all time, top 10 in the current peloton I could give you
Merckx was also one of the best track cyclists of his time. He won a lot of sixday races with Patrick Sercu and was European champion in some disciplines of track cycling as well a few times. So that's cyclocross, track cycling and road cycling. Though he wasn't all that good in cyclocross I've been told. Roger de Vlaeminck was better I think. A lot of cyclists train a lot on a mountain bike by the way. I know Contador does it a lot for instance
Winning the World Cup two times is great by all means, but it has little to do with road cycling. And I don't think it's fair to say that no one in the peloton would be able to do good in mountainbiking. If Rasmussen can then I can see Contador doing it as well to be honest. But why would anyone go from road cycling to mountainbiking?