No. And last year is still fresh, so it's easy to compare the two.
Not quite as fresh as this year.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
No. And last year is still fresh, so it's easy to compare the two.
To some extent yes.No. And last year is still fresh, so it's easy to compare the two.
Both you and I only really missed 2002, but from what can be read up on how the race unfolded, it's just not the same non-event for the GC.To some extent yes.
I started watching the race from 07, but not until 11 I followed the race more intensely. Could some of those editions beforehand have escaped me (and many other I assume)..? Yes, maybe, but out of all those races I have watched, this is the worst - slightly worse than 2022, and again slightly worse than 2012. But I do think that recency bias is definitely a thing in these polls, but in this instance, I don't think it matters that much since the race was so bad. Had the years been reversed, I suspect a greater number of people actually voting last years the worst though. But thats only speculation!
When a racehas 11 pure sprint stages, it kinda has to be up there as well (2004). But at the end of the day, people watch GTs for action between the best riders in the peloton, and as far as I can tell, it somewhat delivered on the important stages. At least compared to what the riders were offered which was slim to absolutely nothing which is much different than this year's route which looked like a mediocre/slightly mediocre route.Both you and I only really missed 2002, but from what can be read up on how the race unfolded, it's just not the same non-event for the GC.
In hindsight and if you are a Roglic fan yes absolutely I can understand this. Objectively, no it was a terrible edition.I'm waiting for the "rate the Giro 2023" thread so I can give it a 10/10.
I feel it's like a controversial arthouse movie masterpiece which might not have a broadly satisfied audience even though I got everything I personally wanted out of it & more.
Best drama & best thriller of the year (that ITT...).
What’s funny is I was in the middle of making it yesterday but saw people were posting their reviews here so thought it would stay here.I'm waiting for the "rate the Giro 2023" thread so I can give it a 10/10.
In hindsight and if you are a Roglic fan yes absolutely I can understand this. Objectively, no it was a terrible edition.
We waited three weeks for GC action which never materialised. But this is grand tour racing and we should expect this. But for a point of reference at least test match cricket which might end in a draw is only 5 days of pointless torture for fans🙂
Because of one stage? I think it's only one for the ages for the people that wanted Roglic to win, for everyone else the Giro wasn't really that interesting.Well this thread aged well. If i remember correctly it was opened on the eve of stage 20. Likely a whole lot of people came here to express their opinion on just how horrible Giro 2023 was. And then the party got canceled the very next day.
All in all this Giro edition turned out to be one for the ages.
But some people crashed! Are you celebrating crashes now? Oh my godWell this thread aged well. If i remember correctly it was opened on the eve of stage 20. Likely a whole lot of people came here to express their opinion on just how horrible Giro 2023 was. And then the party got canceled the very next day.
All in all this Giro edition turned out to be one for the ages.
You are right. Worst Giro in modern times. Certainly historically bad and therefore one for the ages.Well this thread aged well. If i remember correctly it was opened on the eve of stage 20. Likely a whole lot of people came here to express their opinion on just how horrible Giro 2023 was. And then the party got canceled the very next day.
All in all this Giro edition turned out to be one for the ages.