I guess he did, I just saw the Tweet. But no idea who was actually criticizing him.I'm surprised Jorgensen felt that he needed to respond to such nonsense.
Sorry, my rant was a bit off there.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I guess he did, I just saw the Tweet. But no idea who was actually criticizing him.I'm surprised Jorgensen felt that he needed to respond to such nonsense.
No worries, I agree with the rant.I guess he did, I just saw the Tweet. But no idea who was actually criticizing him.
Sorry, my rant was a bit off there.
Looks like I was wrong, he had been given co-leader status prior to wouts crash. Big if true
Jorgenson could have easily had a chance at a podium or more, if riding smarter earlier in the race. They could have had the numbers against MVDP.I wouldn't call it foolishly. They didn't ride for a 6th place, that's sure.
How Jorgenson rode on Wolvenberg contributed to a group later on with Van Baarle, Benoot and Pedersen having a sizable gap that Van der Poel had to bridge across on his own. It was their best chance to win the race, and Jorgenson played his part in it.Jorgenson could have easily had a chance at a podium or more, if riding smarter earlier in the race. They could have had the numbers against MVDP.
Both him and Pedersen could have not rode more for MVDP than they did, so yes... I will call it foolish.
Should have put on the gas put didnt, while having three in the group. Poor.How Jorgenson rode on Wolvenberg contributed to a group later on with Van Baarle, Benoot and Pedersen having a sizable gap that Van der Poel had to bridge across on his own. It was their best chance to win the race, and Jorgenson played his part in it.
In short, yes.I didn't get to see the last 45k or so.
I saw the part where VDP powered away over one of the cobbled climbs where everyone was walking.
I thought I saw Jorgensen only 5-10sec or so behind VDP but when I checked the results he was well down.
Did he blow up in his attempt to follow Mathieu?
For a direct confrontation with van der Poel and on such route Visma has Wout and as he wasn't in the race the idea likely was to try with Matteo instead. It looked rather OK, until Matteo blew up.
It's how the efforts turned out....you can backplay every fart a rider has and still not know what he ate that caused it. I'm amazed they can equalize the chaos with changing strategy and still finish a day like this. That...and Alpecin rode exceptionally and probably with a bit of good luck.Jorgenson could have easily had a chance at a podium or more, if riding smarter earlier in the race. They could have had the numbers against MVDP.
Both him and Pedersen could have not rode more for MVDP than they did, so yes... I will call it foolish.
He could also be finding the limits of his current workload. PN, DDV both had much less pressure and his fortunes were good with general strategy. Welcome to the crosshairs, Mr. Jorgenson. No small mistake goes unpunished.chapeau ...... a brave move nonetheless.
I didn't get to see the last 45k or so.
I saw the part where VDP powered away over one of the cobbled climbs where everyone was walking.
I thought I saw Jorgensen only 5-10sec or so behind VDP but when I checked the results he was well down.
Did he blow up in his attempt to follow Mathieu?