To stay away and then hold on was very impressive such a close finish. Let's hope men's race is as close.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
SlickMongoose said:Fantastic sprint that. Think Emma went too early.
pedromiguelmartins said:Women's racing is nice. What pisses me off are the fanboy/girls that just can't understand how archaic women's cycling is compared with the men's. They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
togo95 said:I must say this section after last Paterberg and the finish line really takes away much of the charm of this race.
togo95 said:I must say this section after last Paterberg and the finish line really takes away much of the charm of this race.
pedromiguelmartins said:So, tinkoff attacking, Trek sucking wheels, Ettix and sky sucking wheels, etc.
Trek makes sense, but ettix and sky?
No. Generally they are just inferior athletes, as of right now. It's a less mature version of the sport.Maxiton said:pedromiguelmartins said:Women's racing is nice. What pisses me off are the fanboy/girls that just can't understand how archaic women's cycling is compared with the men's. They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
Well, since they aren't paid very much, maybe they just aren't doing as many things that . . . belong in the Clinic . . . .
pedromiguelmartins said:They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
pedromiguelmartins said:Women's racing is nice. What pisses me off are the fanboy/girls that just can't understand how archaic women's cycling is compared with the men's. They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
SlickMongoose said:Fantastic sprint that. Think Emma went too early.
If they don't they will always be seen as a weaker version of the sport, as they are now.doperhopper said:pedromiguelmartins said:Women's racing is nice. What pisses me off are the fanboy/girls that just can't understand how archaic women's cycling is compared with the men's. They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
hope they will never get to 90s or 00s
And maybe people want to support it so that it can grow to the point where, much like other similar race format sports like skiing, biathlon, athletics and swimming, the women's competitions are on a much more level footing than they are with cycling?pedromiguelmartins said:No. Generally they are just inferior athletes, as of right now. It's a less mature version of the sport.Maxiton said:pedromiguelmartins said:Women's racing is nice. What pisses me off are the fanboy/girls that just can't understand how archaic women's cycling is compared with the men's. They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
Well, since they aren't paid very much, maybe they just aren't doing as many things that . . . belong in the Clinic . . . .
Or maybe route is further east and finish in Meerbekeluckyboy said:togo95 said:I must say this section after last Paterberg and the finish line really takes away much of the charm of this race.
The final run-in to some road on the outskirts on Oudenaarde is horrible. Boring and ugly to look at, usually a headwind. One of the worst in cycling.
They should route it south of the river and finish in the town instead.
pedromiguelmartins said:No. Generally they are just inferior athletes, as of right now. It's a less mature version of the sport.Maxiton said:pedromiguelmartins said:Women's racing is nice. What pisses me off are the fanboy/girls that just can't understand how archaic women's cycling is compared with the men's. They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
Well, since they aren't paid very much, maybe they just aren't doing as many things that . . . belong in the Clinic . . . .
Exactly. And that's why women's cycling must evolve. As it is there's no comparison at all.Libertine Seguros said:And maybe people want to support it so that it can grow to the point where, much like other similar race format sports like skiing, biathlon, athletics and swimming, the women's competitions are on a much more level footing than they are with cycling?pedromiguelmartins said:No. Generally they are just inferior athletes, as of right now. It's a less mature version of the sport.Maxiton said:pedromiguelmartins said:Women's racing is nice. What pisses me off are the fanboy/girls that just can't understand how archaic women's cycling is compared with the men's. They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
Well, since they aren't paid very much, maybe they just aren't doing as many things that . . . belong in the Clinic . . . .
Kwibus said:pedromiguelmartins said:No. Generally they are just inferior athletes, as of right now. It's a less mature version of the sport.Maxiton said:pedromiguelmartins said:Women's racing is nice. What pisses me off are the fanboy/girls that just can't understand how archaic women's cycling is compared with the men's. They are still in the 60s, as far as strategy/racing/specialization go.
Well, since they aren't paid very much, maybe they just aren't doing as many things that . . . belong in the Clinic . . . .
Yes. So?
In all physical sports women will be inferior. Doesn't mean it ain't entertaining.
Kwibus said:Pray for an attack by a serious rider from Etixx.