F e r o x said:trucido said:Cance > TheRest said:I don't think anyone is accusing GVA of riding stupidly - quite the contrary. So there's no need to "pick one" as it's not "one or the other"El Pistolero said:Valv.Piti said:Alaphilippe is the only ones who realistically could challenge Sagan in a sprint (not really, still, on this climb which is absolutely perfect for Sagan). Belgium really is a joke - I could understand it if it was GVA, who seems to be the only one able to get the better of Sagan on a consistent basis, but Phil Gil 2016? Seriously?![]()
What is it with you people? If GVA doesn't work as much as Sagan to then beat him in a sprint he's called a wheelsucker... If a rider does work with Sagan he's called dumb... It's one or the other... Pick one.
GvA can only beat Sagan when he's done much less work than him.
Nothing stupid about that though. You race to win.
Correction, Sagan often can't finish a race when he has to work a lot. Even when he only works as much as the competition.
Where are these Sagan DNFs you speak of due to fatigue?
Perhaps you need some professional help discerning fact from fiction.