- Feb 25, 2010
- 3,854
- 1
- 0
El Pistolero said:Why with all these people complaing about sprinters never getting a chance, what about climbers and cobbled specialists?
That's what I said.
El Pistolero said:Why with all these people complaing about sprinters never getting a chance, what about climbers and cobbled specialists?
El Pistolero said:Why with all these people complaing about sprinters never getting a chance, what about climbers and cobbled specialists?
El Pistolero said:Why with all these people complaing about sprinters never getting a chance, what about climbers and cobbled specialists?
William H said:The world road race courses tend to suit the cobbled specialists pretty well even if they lack cobbles. After all Boonen, Ballan and Hushovd have all won, and Cancellara is usually thereabouts even if he's never got a medal.
A course for the true climbers would be nice, but it's tough when the format is usually an urban circuit
El Pistolero said:Why with all these people complaing about sprinters never getting a chance, what about climbers and cobbled specialists?
hfer07 said:I just bothered watching the last 5K.......................
no splits, no attacks, no selection , no nothing
and I thought the women's race was boring![]()
hatcher said:Er nobody is complaining sprinters never get a chance, people are complaining that sprinters do occasionally get a chance.
I bet all those in favour of the occasional sprinter course would be delighted with cobbled and mountain races to.
Libertine Seguros said:Sprinters already get their reward in the form of FAR, FAR more chances to win than anybody else, even before they start modifying points jersey systems to give them more achievements.
Climbers have become a huge part of modern cycling, so the discipline needs to be rewarded by giving them a chance of winning the WCs, so let's put them going up and down a cat.1 climb so Contador can win and the UCI can have a self-congratulatory circle jerk for getting a great rider into the rainbow stripes, I mean after all it's not like he wins that much anyway.
Zinoviev Letter said:I don't think that there'd be anything wrong with having a WC with a big climb, and I certainly don't think there'd be the same chorus of whining you see here any time there's a sprinter's race.
El Pistolero said:They get plenty of chances. More than any other type of cyclist.
There's 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2010 and 2011!
Not all sprinters are one trick ponies like Cavendish.
Zinoviev Letter said:I don't think that there'd be anything wrong with having a WC with a big climb, and I certainly don't think there'd be the same chorus of whining you see here any time there's a sprinter's race.
hatcher said:Oh my god. In what world was that the point being made? Show me people complaining that sprinters never get a chance?
Nevermind. I give up.
Thoughtforfood said:Hey Australia, good job leaving home the best lead-out man in the business. If ****ing stupid decisions won the WC's, you would be wearing the rings for the next year. As it stands, Goss got a silver. Ridiculous.
spanky wanderlust said:yup. ****ing stupid is right.
Barca1 said:I can't believe how many bitter people are on this forum...
So it was a sprint finish, so what? So the best sprinter won in the world, so what? I would hope the best sprinter in the world would win the world championships if the course suited a sprint finish. Just as much as I would expect the best climber to win, should it be a hilly course.
Going by the posts here, the UCI should just do away with flat courses as by the sounds of it, flat terrain doesn't really exist in the real world. The Grand Tours should only have hilly/mountain stages. Either that or should we expect a route to suit only a riders like Gilbert, Contador or Evans? Cycling consists of many disciplines, climbers, sprinters, puncheurs etc, this years suited a sprinter and the best man won.
The British team did a tremendous effort in trying to control the race and it showed that it was a team effort.
