dlwssonic said:what a nice sarcastic post about contador the invincible.![]()
Ferminal said:I have a stupid question...
Would Hushovd technically be in Polkas tomorrow, or would no one wear it?
Ferminal said:I have a stupid question...
Would Hushovd technically be in Polkas tomorrow, or would no one wear it?
The Hitch said:Timmy. WTF.
So when Gesink is 2.25 its all right to call the Tour over for him.
BUT
When someone calls Samu down with almost exactly the same time and the same conclusion is reached.
Its "Dont be so dramatic".
Ramira said:Of course not, I don't say it's right either. Just throwing out some things that might be going into this decision without giving any judgement on their merit.
That being said yea I do believe losing time for Samu and Contador is right. You get stuck behind a crash in the finale you lose time it's like that in every single stage race I've ever seen. Is it fair? No. Is it cycling? Yes.
I forgot about that factor. Van de Velde also had this situation.Libertine Seguros said:They're more likely to have been mechanicals caused by the earlier crash - takes a few mins to get serviced so they ride on into the 3k.
Ramira said:Contador,
He has the CAS decision hanging over his head not to mention people are saying he's the greatest cyclist of all time, not to mention no matter what Andy does he'll get cheered and no matter what Alberto does he'll get booed.
please go to the TDF questions threadFerminal said:I have a stupid question...
Would Hushovd technically be in Polkas tomorrow, or would no one wear it?
The Hitch said:So they deserve to lose the 40 seconds they lost thanks to the 2k crash but the guys in the 2k crash dont?
The Hitch said:Timmy. WTF.
So when Gesink is 2.25 its all right to call the Tour over for him.
BUT
When someone calls Samu down with almost exactly the same time and reaches the same conclusion
Its "Dont be so dramatic".
Waterloo Sunrise said:Another insightful classic. So you can declare Schleck invincible due to a 74 second bonus, but if I suggest that infact it is possible that a man with a proven track record and clear strengths might be able to overhaul that gap, it is infact me calling someone invincible.
Also, the 2 minute statement really isn't controvertial - I think finishing within 2 minutes on that course would be a good result for Andy.
jobiwan said:Gilbert was the only one to get points, I believe. We probably won't see Polka for a couple stages. I MAY BE WRONG though.
EDIT: Seems I may be wrong. But Hushovd wearing the Polka without any points would seem rather odd, no?
The Hitch said:So they deserve to lose the 40 seconds they lost thanks to the 2k crash but the guys in the 2k crash dont?
Gloin22 said:Thomas de Gendt has gone to hospital with collarbone worries
Logic-is-your-friend said:I'm sorry but this doesn't make sense. Why is everybody given the 6 seconds time? Why not the same as Evans or Gilbert for that matter? Because the 6 seconds group was NOT the main group, it was either the one behind that or the one behind that one. The crash victims should be given that time and not the 6 seconds time. The guys finishing at 6 seconds rode away from the main group. If rules are rules, they should be applied consistantly. Well, that's how i feel about it.
Libertine Seguros said:It's cos Timmy secretly believes Samu is much better than Gesink and will be able to claw that time back easily, so you're whining, whereas Gesink won't and therefore it's justified to be maudlin.
![]()
The Hitch said:So they deserve to lose the 40 seconds they lost thanks to the 2k crash but the guys in the 2k crash dont?
The Hitch said:So they deserve to lose the 40 seconds they lost thanks to the 2k crash but the guys in the 2k crash dont?
