2011 Tour de Suisse Stage 1: Lugano ITT, 7.3km

Page 9 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 28, 2010
1,399
391
11,180
dlwssonic said:
clearly TGBM could have stormed for the win and beat canc by 20 seconds. But I heard he is good friends with canc and wanted to give him the win and made it sure that he didnt win. I heard he stopped at the top of the mountain and waited for 1 minute to allow the others to do better.

Such an amiable guy that Mollema character. He has quite the knack for suppressing his undoubted greatness.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Chef_Vodnik said:
Yeah, but if everyone does it, regardless of skill, that's no coincidence.

what do you mean?? van garderen only lost 2 seconds to cancellara in final downhil. it only means cancellara is of a different level
 
Jul 15, 2009
284
0
0
Ryo Hazuki said:
what do you mean?? van garderen only lost 2 seconds to cancellara in final downhil. it only means cancellara is of a different level

I'm not talking about Fabian or Van Garderen. I'm talking about the last +/- 15 guys to go on the road. Leipheimer etc.
For example, Leipheimer had 7 Seconds at the Split, and was down 21 at the end, losing 15 seconds.
Velits has 2 Seconds at the Split, and comes in with 21 at the end, losing 19 seconds.
Yes, it's time lost in regard to Cance, but everyone lost between 10-20 seconds, which leads me to believe that conditions hat an effect, albeit a small one.
Schleck had 15 at the split and 42, and he is a VERY Bad descender compared to the aforementioned two. Plus, if conditions have gotten worse progressively (which I believe is the case here, ever so slightly), he probably had the "worst" conditions.
 
Apr 7, 2011
4,886
439
16,580
Chef_Vodnik said:
I'm not talking about Fabian or Van Garderen. I'm talking about the last +/- 15 guys to go on the road. Leipheimer etc.
For example, Leipheimer had 7 Seconds at the Split, and was down 21 at the end, losing 15 seconds.
Velits has 2 Seconds at the Split, and comes in with 21 at the end, losing 19 seconds.
Yes, it's time lost in regard to Cance, but everyone lost between 10-20 seconds, which leads me to believe that conditions hat an effect, albeit a small one.

Cancellara is 10-15 Kilos heavier a much better bikehandler and way more powerful. No suprise here.
 
Jul 15, 2009
284
0
0
Ryo Hazuki said:
kloden lost 30 seconds in downhil, they all lost 20 seconds to cancellara before and after

Good, I did not see Klödens split, I was watching the Dauphiné at the time.
He descended badly by his own standards, too, however, since he was first at the split and could not hold that advantage to the stretch
 
May 12, 2010
1,998
0
0
Yeah, last year on the same route Cancellara was 9 seconds behind Martin on top of the hill, and still won. Cancellara taking 10 to 20 seconds on everyone in a descend is completely normal (just think about his Monaco ITT, or the Olympics), the guys starting earlier probably lost the same amount of time.
 
Jul 15, 2009
284
0
0
Bavarianrider said:
Cancellara is 10-15 Kilos heavier a much better bikehandler and way more powerful. No suprise here.

Of course he is. Laws of physics, and all. I'm not arguing that Schleck did good, because he didn't. I'm just under the impression that the results are slightly skewed because of the weather conditions. Even the Swiss TV guys spoke about it, saying that Fabian would have had a harder time if he had started later on.

But whatever, this forum isn't about free speech, it's a dictatorship ;)
 
Apr 7, 2011
4,886
439
16,580
Chef_Vodnik said:
Of course he is. Laws of physics, and all. I'm not arguing that Schleck did good, because he didn't. I'm just under the impression that the results are slightly skewed because of the weather conditions. Even the Swiss TV guys spoke about it, saying that Fabian would have had a harder time if he had started later on.

But whatever, this forum isn't about free speech, it's a dictatorship ;)

Well he would have won anyway, ithink we can agree on this. After all it doesn't really matter how much time the others lost on him, anyway
 
Jul 15, 2009
284
0
0
Bavarianrider said:
Well he would have won anyway, ithink we can agree on this. After all it doesn't really matter how much time the others lost on him, anyway
Exactly. Nobody cares.
I'm just on about the "worsening" conditions on the road. And I'm betting that worse conditions affect worse bike handlers more then good bike handlers.
But I guess it's more fun to go "ROFL Cunego did bad in the descent TROLOLO"
 
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
Yet another 2nd for TJVG. With Tiralongo and VDB2 off the list, he's my vote for best rider without a win at this point. Granted, he's only had a year and a half, but he's got a ton of top 5s in that period for a non-sprinter.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
This was today:eek:

Ah crap.:eek:

Well from looking at the results the stand out performance seems to be Soler. Wow.

Hes going to be banging at the tour. (if he doesnt fall which he probably will).
 
May 5, 2009
696
1
0
Lanark said:
Yeah, last year on the same route Cancellara was 9 seconds behind Martin on top of the hill, and still won. Cancellara taking 10 to 20 seconds on everyone in a descend is completely normal (just think about his Monaco ITT, or the Olympics), the guys starting earlier probably lost the same amount of time.

yeah. couldn't agree more.
 
Mar 26, 2011
270
0
0
only rider I want even less to win the tour is evans but that's like chosing aids over cancer. both are utter horror

umm, cancer is far worse.. cancer will kill you in months, aids you can live with if you take meds, for quite a long time, supposedly you can have a lifespan 10 or 15 years shorter on average than a healthy person... it still is horrible.. just one can be a very quick death sentence.