- Jul 24, 2009
- 573
- 4
- 9,585
autologous said:Hindsight? They had a pretty good idea of the riders' form after the TT. That's not hindsight. Sky/Wigans maintained the misguided stance of Wigans being leader and getting support in the face of that reality.
They maintained it in the face of reality on the lower slopes of the Angliru. Wigans knew he wasn't at Froome's level, one quick flick of the elbow or a quick selfless chat on the radio is all it would have taken, instead he tied his great pretender's boat anchor to Froome. No hindsight needed.
Dauphine? BFD. 3rd place in this Vuelta? BFD. This is as much as he will ever achieve, the hype that he would ever win a GT was just that. Assuming he would ever do better is what is ridiculous. Vaughters is laughing at the $$$ he fooled Sky into wasting.
Here's hoping Wigans wakes up and realizes his track skills are better served keeping the pace high in Cav's leadout.
Froome pulling off the best ITT of his life is not an indicator of the ability to win the Vuelta in the mountains. Wiggins possibly feeling the strain as the decisive stage 15 climb got going and expecting him to know he couldn't do the climb well enough, radio in to change leadership, and blow himself up pacing Froome up the mountain is expecting way too much.
I don't know why you hate Wiggins, but it's obvious that you do. I have no particular love or hate for the guy.
And winning the Dauphine and 3rd in the Vuelta, if he holds onto it, is no big deal? Wow... forget it. I'm apparently talking to a crazy person.
