- Mar 9, 2010
- 551
- 0
- 0
everyone is talking about wiggo. naturally since he is in the lead.
but it is getting harder and harder to see past nibali winning this.
but it is getting harder and harder to see past nibali winning this.
roundabout said:Leipheimer is no slouch on the steep climbs. At least those in the States. Brasstown Bald when he got the chance to ride it and he seemed to always attack on the Sierra Road when the Tour of California was in February.
Libertine Seguros said:I'm not saying Leipheimer is a slouch on the steep climbs. I'm pointing out that Wiggins is being written off by many as weaker on the steeper stuff but we've never seen him take it on in his top form (such as that he's in right now), and if he's being written off because of the style of rider he is, well, it's not too dissimilar from Leipheimer, and Leipheimer has shown himself to be pretty good on the really steep stuff.
Leipheimer also schooled everybody on the Rettenbachferner in the 2005 Deutschlandtour, and that's one of the hardest climbs in Europe. It's basically the Mortirolo, but at 1000m more altitude.
Libertine Seguros said:I'm not saying Leipheimer is a slouch on the steep climbs. I'm pointing out that Wiggins is being written off by many as weaker on the steeper stuff but we've never seen him take it on in his top form (such as that he's in right now), and if he's being written off because of the style of rider he is, well, it's not too dissimilar from Leipheimer, and Leipheimer has shown himself to be pretty good on the really steep stuff.
Leipheimer also schooled everybody on the Rettenbachferner in the 2005 Deutschlandtour, and that's one of the hardest climbs in Europe. It's basically the Mortirolo, but at 1000m more altitude.
Libertine Seguros said:I'm not saying Leipheimer is a slouch on the steep climbs. I'm pointing out that Wiggins is being written off by many as weaker on the steeper stuff but we've never seen him take it on in his top form (such as that he's in right now), and if he's being written off because of the style of rider he is, well, it's not too dissimilar from Leipheimer, and Leipheimer has shown himself to be pretty good on the really steep stuff.
Leipheimer also schooled everybody on the Rettenbachferner in the 2005 Deutschlandtour, and that's one of the hardest climbs in Europe. It's basically the Mortirolo, but at 1000m more altitude.
Swede1 said:I fully agree with you. He is untested on the long steep climbs in peak form. He may very well ride the Angliru like Nibali rode the Zoncolan this year. All he has to do is not go with a JRod or Nibali acceleration. If nibbles tries to follow Jrod he will probably crack, so Wiggins should just ride steadily and he will eventually catch Nibali.
auscyclefan94 said:Being good on thst steep stuff in the Deutschland Tour is different to the Vuelta.![]()
Waterloo Sunrise said:I don't like to question people's basic reading comprehension, but did you read the thread leading in to this?
Libertine Seguros said:This is probably optimistic - Nibbles is the one in the driving seat here. He's proven on this kind of climb, he's got the lead that means he doesn't need to chase J-Rod, and he isn't the sort to panic and do it either; if he was, he'd have been more likely to have done it with Mosquera on Bola del Mundo, with only 30 seconds or so to gain, than with Rodríguez and 3 minutes. If Nibali rides his own tempo all the way up the climb it's optimistic to assume that if Wiggins rides his own he will eventually catch Nibali - we simply don't know what Wiggins' own tempo on a climb like this is.
auscyclefan94 said:I know what they have been saying. They have been talking about Wiggins' ability on the steeper gradients and people have been using Leipheimer as an example who is similar to Wiggins who has according to some dealt with the steeper gradients quite well.
auscyclefan94 said:Being good on thst steep stuff in the Deutschland Tour is different to the Vuelta.![]()
goggalor said:Yay for Moncoutie. Wiggins massively impressive again. The crowds less so. The last 500 m were completely barren!
Deutschland Tour was a good race but trying to compare Levi in 2005 in a race after the tour de france with Wiggins in la Vuelta is a little unfair.Waterloo Sunrise said:Yes, but the Deutchland tour you mock was an achievement of Leipheimer, who has also done well in the Vuelta you contrast it with.
Nevermind, I'm too tired for an argument.
Libertine Seguros said:This is probably optimistic - Nibbles is the one in the driving seat here. He's proven on this kind of climb, he's got the lead that means he doesn't need to chase J-Rod, and he isn't the sort to panic and do it either; if he was, he'd have been more likely to have done it with Mosquera on Bola del Mundo, with only 30 seconds or so to gain, than with Rodríguez and 3 minutes. If Nibali rides his own tempo all the way up the climb it's optimistic to assume that if Wiggins rides his own he will eventually catch Nibali - we simply don't know what Wiggins' own tempo on a climb like this is.
Extremely tired. Has to be said though that the other two who bridged up to the break, Txurruka and Duarte, were even worse, underperforming quite massively. I guess the 3 of them used too much energy bridging to the break.auscyclefan94 said:How did Matthias Frank look? After my spray of BMC, they finally get a result.![]()
Swede1 said:Didnt nibbles try to follow mosquera on the first MTF in the Vuelta last year and crack? He probably won't make that mistake again, but its possible that he overestimates his own ability. Since Wiggins is in the lead, Nibali has to attack him and all Wiggins has to do is stay in his slipstream. THe only way to drop Wiggins is an explosive attack and im not sure nibbles can sustain his effort after an explosive attack. But yeah we don't really know how he will respond, so its probly optimistic to say he will stay with Nibali, and its probably just wrong to say he will crack and lose massive amounts of time.
Zinoviev Letter said:The best thing for Wiggins was a strong, steady, pace. It plays to his strengths, but more importantly it discourages attacks and makes it tough for those who do attack to get a significant gap. Froome was the last Sky domestique left, so it was his job to set that pace.
Because he did it so effectively, there wasn't a meaningful attack until Martin went off with Mollema and Slagter. At that point Wiggins was still fresh and was able to grind his way up behind them. If Wiggins had shared the work earlier with Froome he might not have been able to do that. If Sky had neglected to set the pace in the first place, there would have been more serious attacks and Wiggins would have used energy dealing with them.