2012 Giro d'Italia, May 6th, stage 2: Herning → Herning, 206K

Page 14 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 7, 2010
612
0
0
pastronef said:
that's not respect, that's LEGS. look at how he really struggled during the sprint, he waited and waited behing hunter, and when he stood on the pedals the others were much faster.
i hope he can get a better condition in the next weeks.

in the last 400m he didnt have the legs, sure. but when he was trying to get a position in the train(s) he didnt have the respect - people were leaning all over him and pushing him around like a neo pro
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Waterloo Sunrise said:
Are you playing dumb again, or shall I explain the reference?

Waterloo Sunrise said:
I'm not making any comparison, just thought his comments were comically silly and deserved trotting out in the circumstances.

Personally, as much as I would like Phinney to be penalised, I'm not sure it would be very just given that happens all the time.

Because I really read that article of Roche :rolleyes:
 
Waterloo Sunrise said:
I'm not making any comparison, just thought his comments were comically silly and deserved trotting out in the circumstances.

Personally, as much as I would like Phinney to be penalised, I'm not sure it would be very just given that happens all the time.
Oh, I wouldn't want Phinney to be penalized per se, as I rather like the lad. But I think it's a pretty silly state of affairs, and the UCI should announce a no-tolerance policy on this kind of stuff and put an end to it.
 
hrotha said:
Oh, I wouldn't want Phinney to be penalized per se, as I rather like the lad. But I think it's a pretty silly state of affairs, and the UCI should announce a no-tolerance policy on this kind of stuff and put an end to it.
Such a rule should be enforced at the start of the season. Does any team protest against it (drafting) though?
 
The Hitch said:
Nah, would have been unfair on the lad to lose the pink on a mechanical

images
 
hrotha said:
Oh, I wouldn't want Phinney to be penalized per se, as I rather like the lad. But I think it's a pretty silly state of affairs, and the UCI should announce a no-tolerance policy on this kind of stuff and put an end to it.

May i ask what happened during this stage? I missed it. :eek:
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
hrotha said:
Oh, I wouldn't want Phinney to be penalized per se, as I rather like the lad. But I think it's a pretty silly state of affairs, and the UCI should announce a no-tolerance policy on this kind of stuff and put an end to it.

Nobody wants to see his favorite lose because of a mechanical or crash. There for, the judges turn a blind eye to this kind of drafting.

These guys train behind a derny all the time, do you really think drafting behind a car is a safety issue :rolleyes:. I think it's a lot safer behind a car than in the middle of a peloton... Besides, don't you think the peloton is drafting behind TV motors half of the time in a final? :rolleyes: Good luck getting back on your own power then.
 
Feb 15, 2012
19
0
0
hrotha said:
Personally I think it's a disgrace to see the mechanics pretending to be doing something when we all know what's happening. If it were up to me I'd ban any sort of contact between cars and riders, except through bottles, and that only for up to a second.

A little consistency for these kinds of offences would be nice. I don't mind riders getting a little help after crashes and mechanicals, but I don't like how random the punishment, or lack thereof, seems to be..
 
El Pistolero said:
Nobody wants to see his favorite lose because of a mechanical or crash. There for, the judges turn a blind eye to this kind of drafting.

These guys train behind a derny all the time, do you really think drafting behind a car is a safety issue :rolleyes:. I think it's a lot safer behind a car than in the middle of a peloton... Besides, don't you think the peloton is drafting behind TV motors half of the time in a final? :rolleyes: Good luck getting back on your own power then.
It's not mainly a safety issue, same way race radios are not mainly a safety issue. Which is why I compared them.

The actual issue is that cycling is a bike race, not a car race. Might as well get in the car to catch up.
 
Zam_Olyas said:
Andrew Talansky ‏ @andrewtalansky
Getting help from the car is not "cheating" for those of u saying that. Not Phinney's fault bike malfunctioned. He is the deserving leader
He's right (obviously he's a proud American, but anyway).

Who really cares about this? Otherwise Geraint Thomas is in pink, hurray! They'll both be in the last bus come the second week anyway.
 
El Pistolero said:
Neither is Renshaw yet he did better.

Even by your standards that is ridiculous.

You need to stop having such hatred for none belgian riders. Its really not their fault they were lucky enough to be born in better countries.

Thomas is more of a tter and prologue specialist. Renshaw is more of a sprinter, as evidenced by the fact that Renshaw has many sprint wins to his name including one last week, and a 2nd on Champs, where as Thomas came 2nd in the prologue yesterday,

You think you can understand?
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
The Hitch said:
Even by your standards that is ridiculous.

You need to stop having such hatred for none belgian riders. Its really not their fault they were lucky enough to be born in better countries.

Thomas is more of a tter and prologue specialist. Renshaw is more of a sprinter, as evidenced by the fact that Renshaw has many sprint wins to his name including one last week, and a 2nd on Champs, where as Thomas came 2nd in the prologue yesterday,

You think you can understand?

Renshaw is not a sprinter. Clearly lacks the speed. He's a lead out man, can position him self well during a sprint, isn't slow either, so sometimes that gets him a win. His second place at the Champs was all because of the domination HTC train. Cancellara would have ended up in second place there as well and he's not a sprinter.

It's not hating, it's an observation and Renshaw clearly lacks speed to be a sprinter. What has a prologue to do with sprinting? Or leading someone out for that matter? Renshaw has done much better lead-outs for Cavendish than Geraint Thomas today and therefor I call him a better lead-out man.

Renshaw has many sprint wins to his name? Really? Where? I can count them on one hand.

You think you can understand?
 
El Pistolero said:
Renshaw is not a sprinter. Clearly lacks the speed. He's a lead out man, can position him self well during a sprint, isn't slow either, so sometimes that gets him a win. His second place at the Champs was all because of the domination HTC train. Cancellara would have ended up in second place there as well and he's not a sprinter.

It's not hating, it's an observation and Renshaw clearly lacks speed to be a sprinter. What has a prologue to do with sprinting? Or leading someone out for that matter? Renshaw has done much better lead-outs for Cavendish than Geraint Thomas today.

Its not about Renshaw, you were trying to **** on Thomas, who you clearly hate with a passion, becuase he decided that an olympic gold medal was more prestigious than your beloved cobbles.

Yeah Renshaw did better in the sprint? Why, Because he is a more of a sprinter.

Maybe you will start ridiculing Thomas when he starts losing to Agnoli in the mountains.

I assume your justification will go something like this

It's not hating, it's an observation and Agnoli clearly lacks climbing skills to be a climber. What has a prologue to do with climbing?
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
hrotha said:
It's not mainly a safety issue, same way race radios are not mainly a safety issue. Which is why I compared them.

The actual issue is that cycling is a bike race, not a car race. Might as well get in the car to catch up.

Yet there's a lot more motor pacing going on than car pacing ;) That's the real problem, not the subject you're addressing.