UlleGigo said:
That and a little training technique being used by Sky that was invented by a well known doctor that had some undisclosed, but obviously well known, extra elements to it.
Do you think everyone is referring to them, as I have done, as 'UK Postal' because they're really truly super duper riders?
It is the Sky fanbois who look rediculous here. You have to maintain a realistic perspective here and I am certainly doing that.
I don't expect to get anywhere however. I'm dealing with a rich assortment of know-nothings.
Riders punching above their weight when given the teams complete support = obvious doping?
I find some members of Sky suspect, but not enough to call them 'UK Postal'.
Seems that if any team shows any good form, then they must be doping, happens every year, if it's not Contador being accused of doping, it's Voeckler, or any number of riders who have moments of exceptional performance. People can drag out numbers all they want, but it must make cycling the most boring sport for them if they believe that if someone does better than someone else they must be doping.
I'm not saying Sky are not doping, but I'm not saying they are either, just tired of the same thing happening every grand tour, those in front getting accused on these forums as dopers.