- Jul 18, 2010
- 707
- 0
- 0
issoisso said:Say again Iván?
Adrenaline fueled bravado too soon after the finish maybe? I think he knows quite well when he's thinking rationally that it isn't so, of course unless it's of a decent uphill length.
issoisso said:Say again Iván?
La Pandera said:Adrenaline fueled bravado too soon after the finish maybe? I think he knows quite well when he's thinking rationally that it isn't so, of course unless it's of a decent uphill length.
Kwibus said:Yes yes Libertine. We all are very well aware that it's just the TDU....
And yes we all know few riders have top form, but Gerrans certainly has form since he only just became national champion.
It doesn't matter. Valverde won't be in topform either, but he did win after a 2 year suspension. That's just great.
No matter if it's the TDU, which actually was contested quite fiercely this year with aggresive riding despite the tiny hills.
El Pistolero said:Seems to me Valverde actually had the benefit on some riders here. If we can believe everything that's been told in the media Valverde has trained really hard last 1.5 years. He looks skinnier than ever and was more motivated than any other cyclist in this Tour Down Under. Perhaps he will peak too soon lol. It's not very wise to be so good in January if you want to ride a good GC in the Tour.
El Pistolero said:Seems to me Valverde actually had the benefit on some riders here. If we can believe everything that's been told in the media Valverde has trained really hard last 1.5 years. He looks skinnier than ever and was more motivated than any other cyclist in this Tour Down Under. Perhaps he will peak too soon lol. It's not very wise to be so good in January if you want to ride a good GC in the Tour.
mewmewmew13 said:I really enjoyed watching the last few k's last night...a very well-timed Movistar team.
I was happy for Valverde's win...a hugely emotional comeback for him.
He really looks so different, does anyone else think so?? I know he's super low weight but his face just looks so changed....
El Pistolero said:He meant flat, otherwise he wouldn't have mentioned Cavendish. It's not the only foolish part he said in that interview though. I don't believe for once Valverde won't try and contest the intermediate sprints or final sprint.
La Pandera said:He's hyping his boy that's all. If you want to accept what he says as his deep down belief then that's your choice. I personally think that considering he's competed against all these sprinters on a regular basis that he knows that Valverde won't be beating them on flat finishes (regularly). Although, according to Samu, Valverde could've won the last WC road race held in Spain had he chosen the correct gear to sprint in, losing to Boonen(1st) and I believe Bettini.
La Pandera said:What advantage is there in being out of competition for almost 2 years?I agree that he was likely more motivated than many of his competitors but no more than any of the Aussies that had hopes of winning the stage.
+1El Pistolero said:Almost 2 years being only a year and 6 months. There's no advantage, but his disadvantage is little if he really trained as hard as he has lead us to believe. Considering his talent, the weak competition, his motivation and the fact that it's a preperation race for most it isn't a big surprise he won.
El Pistolero said:Almost 2 years being only a year and 6 months. There's no advantage, but his disadvantage is little if he really trained as hard as he has lead us to believe. Considering his talent, the weak competition, his motivation and the fact that it's a preperation race for most it isn't a big surprise he won.
La Pandera said:No advantage? Okay then what is his "benefit" compared to his opponents that weren't out of competition during that period other than his motivation in returning to competition?
True no distinct advantage yet seems like not really a disadvantage either (see willunga hill)La Pandera said:What advantage is there in being out of competition for almost 2 years?I agree that he was likely more motivated than many of his competitors but no more than any of the Aussies that had hopes of winning the stage.
Froome19 said:True no distinct advantage yet seems like not really a disadvantage either (see willunga hill)
but he would probably have trained much harder than any of the other riders in order to prove to himself and others he's back and is probably already closer to his peak than most other riders due to it (is at a greater level of fitness) and his training programme instead of starting in december to build up fitness started much earlier and he wouldn't have to focus on peaking for races late in the calendar so his fitness is at a much great optimum as he could have started training rigorously earlier.
Froome19 said:True no distinct advantage yet seems like not really a disadvantage either (see willunga hill)
but he would probably have trained much harder than any of the other riders in order to prove to himself and others he's back and is probably already closer to his peak than most other riders due to it (is at a greater level of fitness) and his training programme instead of starting in december to build up fitness started much earlier and he wouldn't have to focus on peaking for races late in the calendar so his fitness is at a much great optimum as he could have started training rigorously earlier.
Dekker_Tifosi said:He showed climbing potential in those rabo-tests as well. I mean 7 w/kg is insane
Dekker_Tifosi said:It's good to learn this way for Wilco. It's not the U23 where you can easily make up for mistakes like that.
karlboss said:These are power at Vo2 max, a pro can hold this for between 5-8 minutes if they are fresh. That a world class pursuiter has high numbers in this time period surely can't be a surprise. These results are not a good predictor of future GT stardom. 30-60minute w/kg would be. I dare say the highest w/kg at Vo2 Max will come from Rodriguez or Gilbert and I would expect closer to 8w/kg.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Well the way I know it is that the test they do they change the amount of W ever 5 minutes... if you're on the bike for more than 1 hour then you're only starting to get to above 400w (which only with the lightest riders would get to 7 w/kg, Gesink had to push 500w+ to get to 7 w/kg)
if that's the vo2max then youre right. If not... then it's the other test with a wrong name
Clearly you understand nothing about max tests...El Pistolero said:"The dominance of Philippe Gilbert on the Muur de Huy was pretty clear: at the finish of a tactically perfect race, the Belgian champion rode the last Km (112m of climbing) in 2’40”, with a VAM of 2520m/h, corresponding to about 570w, assuming a body weight of 68 Kg."
^ 8.3 w/kg
Rodriguez: 8.2 w/kg at FW
Samu and Vino were also just over 8 w/kg