luckyboy said:
Yeah but this isn't European so every tiny mistake must be amplified and harshly criticised
Nothing to do with European.
To completely destroy your argument, here are some comments from my beloved race
theyoungest said:
And the other climb is less than 4% for 10 km, although it looks like the Zoncolan on the profile. Hm, maybe Sagan could survive this.
theyoungest said:
As an (apparent) Poland expert, can you tell us how hard stage 5 actually is? You know, ignoring the profile that makes it look like a Giro stage?
This was the profile
Poland is very very much in europe.
You may also remember one of Libertines attacks on Guardini and his inability to climb
I can't find it, because the key words "Libertine Seguros" "Andrea Guardini" and "dropped" give me about 500 different posts from LS about Guadini being unable to climb
http://www.google.co.uk/#sclient=ps....,cf.osb&fp=a88b69dd15f1b6f2&biw=1280&bih=830
Anyway, in one of these attacks, Libertine posted a profile of an Italian one day race where Guardini was like the only person dropped.
The profile was of a couple of 3% climbs made to look like the Gardeccia stage and everyone critiscsed it.
Also the only existing profile of Beijing rr to my knowledge is this
and it has been subjected to many comparisons to Zoncolan, and comments about a Zomegnan ideal stage.
So basically critiscsms of joke profiles happen all the time.