theyoungest said:Luckily the Worlds don't really have a classics course. Although the distance might be a problem for Froomedog.
theyoungest said:Luckily the Worlds don't really have a classics course. Although the distance might be a problem for Froomedog.
I think you need to take a second look at the course then.theyoungest said:Luckily the Worlds don't really have a classics course. Although the distance might be a problem for Froomedog.
Pricey_sky said:I wasn't saying that he will or will not win the Worlds, just that is his goal and these races are his prep. He showed today that he is returning to form and that was my point.
JRanton said:Ok, but when you have your team work to place you perfectly for the finale and you end up getting blown out the back door you can't be satisfied. He'll have known before the race that his form had improved since Colorado. He wanted to test himself, which is fine, but the results weren't good!
JRanton said:Yes, he can improve further and finish in the 30s position wise as opposed to the 40s. Do you not agree that his L-B-L result is a pretty good indication that he has no chance of placing well at the worlds, especially considering that he was clearly in very good form at the time?
Dekker_Tifosi said:Just saw the replay again on Eurosport.
The sprint is just unbelievable. Even after Van Avermaet gets loose of Sagan he still doesn't even gain a meter on Gesink. And after watching that Alberta sprint you don't really think Gesink has any chance at all in ANY sprint
del1962 said:I don't recall the Alberta one, was it as uphill as this one?
Dekker_Tifosi said:Just saw the replay again on Eurosport.
The sprint is just unbelievable. Even after Van Avermaet gets loose of Sagan he still doesn't even gain a meter on Gesink. And after watching that Alberta sprint you don't really think Gesink has any chance at all in ANY sprint
Dekker_Tifosi said:this pretty much. everytime we expect something it goes horrible wrong. So most of the time we expect nothing and just hope for the best
jsem94 said:Man, Gesink just got booted off the shortlist for next years CQ.
murali said:how come?
he got 220 points yest, but his cq score will actually dip after the vuelta gets over.
At the end of the year, those are the same...Hugo Koblet said:The CQ Game doesn't use current ranking but year ranking.
Yeah it was flat, but more importantly: Gesink said he was already cooked before that sprint. He'd won two mountain sprints, and created the front split pretty much on his own.Kwibus said:Pretty sure it was flat. Not really comparable.
Hugo Koblet said:The CQ Game doesn't use current ranking but year ranking.
Kwibus said:I think Sagan used up too much energy chasing. He seemed to be riding on a small gear though.
tomorrow said:In Slovakian paper they write, sagan had a flat in the final meters, and honestly, actually it is exactly what it looked like, he had problem even before Gesink started sprinting and he nearly crashed into Avarmaet I think. However, there is not his statement yet, so we'll have to wait.
Dekker_Tifosi said:The worlds will be predictable. Some all out attacks in the last lap, a small group sprint with an easy win for Sa... Evansthe sprinter
Gesink rode on the front for large parts of the final k, after chasing down the 3 leaders. And then he rode a super long sprint. At first I thought: how stupid are you? But actually he made the final more about endurance, and less about explosiveness. That's less suited to Sagan.murali said:I just hope that it is a flat.
The way he stopped pedaling was very depressing to watch. I felt as if i just saw a flying superman suddenly fall to the ground like stone.
