2013 Tour of Qatar (3rd-8th February), 2.HC

Page 12 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jan 11, 2010
15,621
4,560
28,180
Waterloo Sunrise said:
BMC will be chasing the breaks for everyone else's sprinters then, goodo.
Lol, the Cav and Sky fan left disappointed ;)

Taylor Phinney, what a machine. Dropped three riders in the final k alone.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,196
29,839
28,180
theyoungest said:
Lol, the Cav and Sky fan left disappointed ;)

Taylor Phinney, what a machine. Dropped three riders in the final k alone.
While still looking totally calm. So incredible :cool:
 
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
GC
1. Bookwalter
2. Phinney +6
3. Blythe +10
4. Van Avermaet +10
5. Schar +10
6. Eisel +11
7. Boasson Hagen +15
8. Thomas +15
 
Sep 9, 2009
6,483
138
17,680
theyoungest said:
Lol, the Cav and Sky fan left disappointed ;)

Taylor Phinney, what a machine. Dropped three riders in the final k alone.

I'm genuinely pretty pleased to be honest - OPQS could easily have lost 20-30 seconds after yesterday and been up the spout.

Lol at Phinney.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Carols said:
Wow about 10 spectators there.....what a popular cycling country:D

that doesn't say much though. in qatar people watch everything on tv in their airco filled homes. football is very popular in their stadiums are all empty as wel..
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,196
29,839
28,180
Ryo Hazuki said:
that doesn't say much though. in qatar people watch everything on tv in their airco filled homes. football is very popular in their stadiums are all empty as wel..
Well I wouldn't like to be out in conditions like that too (wind), so it sounds quite reasonable.
 
Oct 23, 2009
5,772
0
17,480
Sky seems to have lost Stannard and Rasch very early on, they were down to 6 after just 3 km's or so. Rasch being dropped is quite expected, but I'm surprised that Stannard did so badly. Wonder if something happened.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,196
29,839
28,180
maltiv said:
Sky seems to have lost Stannard and Rasch very early on, they were down to 6 after just 3 km's or so. Rasch being dropped is quite expected, but I'm surprised that Stannard did so badly. Wonder if something happened.
I must say that I didn't notice Stannard disappear, but it was clear from the start that Rasch was hanging on with his teeth.
 
Oct 26, 2012
229
0
0
BMC have so many cards to play for the rest of the tour now. surely one of their guys should take hit from here
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
BlenJones2 said:
BMC have so many cards to play for the rest of the tour now. surely one of their guys should take hit from here

how? they don't exactly have the best sprinter and breaks won't stay away
 
Jan 3, 2013
25
0
0
Ryo Hazuki said:
how? they don't exactly have the best sprinter and breaks won't stay away

They have Blythe, but he's certainly not one of the best sprinters here.
Guess i have more faith in Phinney, he went for the bonus second at stage one, that might be a way. And you newer now about the crosswinds.
 
Oct 26, 2012
229
0
0
blythe and phinney can both sprint well enough that one theoretically one could target the intermediates and the other maybe for the final. Yes they wont outpace cav, degenkolb etc in a normal sprint but it may split up again tomorrow and the teams clearly going well
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
BlenJones2 said:
blythe and phinney can both sprint well enough that one theoretically one could target the intermediates and the other maybe for the final. Yes they wont outpace cav, degenkolb etc in a normal sprint but it may split up again tomorrow and the teams clearly going well

there's not going to be any more wind according to the forecasts
 
Jun 9, 2011
2,926
9
11,495
maltiv said:
Sky seems to have lost Stannard and Rasch very early on, they were down to 6 after just 3 km's or so. Rasch being dropped is quite expected, but I'm surprised that Stannard did so badly. Wonder if something happened.

Stannard was there, Sutton + Rasch were left behind.
 
Oct 23, 2009
5,772
0
17,480
Ruudz0r said:
Stannard was there, Sutton + Rasch were left behind.
Indeed, you're right. Don't know why I thought it was Stannard, but I blame my low-quality stream :eek: