And I support GesinkNetserk said:I support Tom Boonen, but I think Alberto Contador would've won the Tour if he hadn't crashed out.
LaFlorecita said:That logic completely ignores the difference in shape for Valverde, Contador, and the difference in parcours.
And he would announce it 1 month before start,Nibali wouldnt be able to change his schedule lolLaFlorecita said:So I take it if "Nib" wins the Giro next year, and finishes second at the Tour, he won't be "the boss"?
Part of me really wants to see Alberto ride the Giro too. Oh, how fun that would be![]()
I don't agree the comparison with Valverde is linear, but your analysis is reasonable. Contador and Froome's fanboys seem to ignore how far down were them after stage 5, of course assuming Froome would have finished that stage.Cramps said:Contador was about 2:30 down on Nibali when he crashed out. Nibali went on to destroy the opposition, winning by almost 8 minutes over 2nd place Peraud, and in particular almost 9:40 minutes over Valverde.
It follows that for Contador to beat Nibali's time in the Tour, he would have beaten Valverde by at least 12 minutes.
So if Contador absolutely CRUSHES Valverde in the Vuelta, then maybe he could have beat Nibali in the Tour. Otherwise, Nibali seems like the more likely winner.
meat puppet said:snippositive thing.
IronCQ said:Well, i thought writing the 2014 and 2013 results in a funny way to explain the weirdness of the poll results wasnt really trolling, but now i know who makes standards here. Its not that i really support specific riders, i just enjoy watching and practicing so I'm quite ok with everything or everybody winning. What i don't like is lack of respect to some racers, diminishing their victories just based on pure speculation. We know how hard it is. There is no walk in the park here. So maybe Berto will win the 2015 tour. Until july, the boss is Nib, may u like it or not. And it's right soIMHO because in 2013 the n.1 was Chris even with Vincenzo having a first and second place in Gt.
Agree 100% with the bolded.Jspear said:AC is very close to proving he was the best GT rider of the 2014 season.
cineteq said:I don't agree the comparison with Valverde is linear, but your analysis is reasonable. Contador and Froome's fanboys seem to ignore how far down were them after stage 5, of course assuming Froome would have finished that stage.
What's your point? Was it a secret there was a cobbled stage? Should have been neutralized?UpTheRoad said:The deficit was entirely due to the cobbled stage. Nibali took 2 seconds on Contador in Sheffield and Contador took 3 seconds back the day before (???) he crashed out.
Absolutely. Nothing Nibali couldn't have controlled to minimize any damage (if any).UpTheRoad said:AC in top shape and behind on GC. Can you say attacks galore?
CF behind on GC. Can you say attacks galore?
Red Rick said:Nibali only had that gap cause of a wet cobble stage in the Tour, which happens once in every 20 or more years. Racing on wet cobbles has very little to do with GT ability in general. Also, the Tour was the only race where Nibali reached a good (in this case, great) level. He got dropped in every other international race he entered.
Tour champion =/ best GT rider
Are you suggesting Valverde is the best 2014 GT rider?Red Rick said:Tour champion =/ best GT rider
cineteq said:Are you suggesting Valverde is the best 2014 GT rider?
PS: Btw, why is Betancur in the poll and not Quintana? What if Quintana would have won La Vuelta?
Afrank said:A little contradictory those two paragraphs.![]()
cineteq said:Are you suggesting Valverde is the best 2014 GT rider?
PS: Btw, why is Betancur in the poll and not Quintana? What if Quintana would have won La Vuelta?
Afrank said:A little contradictory those two paragraphs.![]()
Can you? => Poll: Who is the best GT rider in 2014?LaFlorecita said:Can't you read? It's a thread about Contador vs Nibali
So are you trolling us then? In the end, you never answered the question, thanks.Red Rick said:Betancur is a troll option, just like Vino. Who doesn't like Betancur?![]()