Trouble is all British honours go through a POSITIVE vetting committee.Moose McKnuckles said:Since Wiggins got a knighthood for winning the Tour, surely Froome deserves a purple heart or whatever the British give to injured heroes.
![]()
behy77 said:hi
Who do you think will win the fifth stage???![]()
Publicus said:I'm going to go out on a limb and say Froome doesn't lose any time to any GC candidates tomorrow.
alspacka said:Mons-en-Pévèle is 5 star though right?
Publicus said:Incorrect. Arenberg is NOT part of the course tomorrow. The race stops before entering the forest.
blaxland said:This should be an extremely difficult stage for all riders in the TDF.There are lots of variables to this stage,hopefully Langevelde or hayman can get a lucky win.But realistically Cancellara,Boonen and Van marck are all favourites.What im looking forward to most is seeing which of the gc favourites loose time and which dont?my money is on Froome loosing bigtime"
The thing is, it's not the cobblestones. It's happened so much before with the positioning and the stress in the peloton, so it's important to be in a good position when you hit the stones.
Good one,I will add him to contenders listOrbit501 said:I quite fancy Haussler as an outsider to do something tomorrow. He seems to be in decent form.
Let it go mate,you know...its Okjaylew said:Not cool, Parrulo. Imo, mods shouldn't alter thread titles for something so trivial or personal, just if it's offensive, breaks a forum rule, or the author requests it.
On the other hand competition is a lot weaker,so I favour him pretty high,there is almost nobody who will reel him in (except bmc,belkin,maybe garmin and omega) like in P-R.The Hitch said:You expect Canc to do what? Breal away solo on the cobbles. I don't know. In Roubaix, yeah, in TDF stage 5, 140km only and no real hard sections, it is different.
Dazed and Confused said:None of the sections used are 5 stars.
Reduced in length etc.
Way too much carnage if the toughest paves were use here. Now its just right. A perfect challenge for the modern stage race peloton.
karlboss said:I have a feeling longer and harder(ie actually ride Paris Roubaix or similar) would actually be safer. The thinking being whilst skills would be pushed, it greatly reduces the necessity to be at the front when you hit the cobbles. There wouldn't be quite the crazy rush of 2010 to the first sector and the race is completely hectic from then on. PR cobbles are spread out over 150 km. Number one you can't maintain a crazy pace for 150km, you can try over 70. Number two if you fall there is time to come back if you're good enough in 150km. Then with long hard sectors the peloton will stretch out even more especially when you consider the number of non climbers who won't have any part at the front. A stretched peloton means fewer people fighting to be first onto each sector.
Though I do think keeping the stage length, and cobbles overall length the same, but increasing the difficulty of the cobbles would increase the stress going onto the first sector and make crashes more likely.
From a racing point of view a longer cobbled stage would demonstrate and award significant time to a GC contender who can actually ride cobbles, not just whoever gets lucky. Though luck always plays a part in cycle racing.