2016 TdF, Stage 12: Montpellier → Mont Ventoux (178km)

Page 62 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Re: Re:

Gloin22 said:
The Hitch said:
In 2011 stage 1 Contador's group got taken out by a spectator on a flat stage. He lost 1.20 and without that loss he would have been on the podium.

Why should spectators taking out riders suddenly be neutralised if its never been before?

Because times change??? 2011... different juries, different opinions.

And essentially, Tour PR. Tour would be mockery across the world and media if they let that stand like that.

Why did GVA not win the CSS last year then?

Because they rather see British cyclists win.
 
Jul 4, 2011
1,475
0
0
Mmmm not sure I agree that the times should have been effectively neutralized. And certainly not if this means ASO can disregard their lack of organisation by simply making up times to those affected.
 
Jun 9, 2014
3,967
1,836
16,680
Re:

The Hitch said:
In 2011 stage 1 Contador's group got taken out by a spectator on a flat stage. He lost 1.20 and without that loss he would have been on the podium.

Why should spectators taking out riders suddenly be neutralised if its never been before?

Apples and oranges. You have the fact that the motorbike was involved, so there is some direct responsibility for the organization. And you have the fact that the team support was essentially nil due to the course congestion.
 
Jul 7, 2015
1,681
354
11,180
What rule have they invented to prevent Froome from being DQ'd for moving without a bike?

Inb4 they penalise Aru but not Froome
 
Apr 10, 2011
4,818
0
0
Re: Re:

infeXio said:
Oliwright said:
infeXio said:
WillemS said:
Apparently, the two will get Mollema's time.

That's messed up..

how?

How is it not?

Spectators have caused crashes before with no neutralisations taking place.

Indeed. But this was and could be blamed on ASO directly.

The fans from the top got down and there was too many people on the road. They *** up.
 
Jul 22, 2011
96
2
8,685
This is what happens when the biggest stage has the last 5k lopped of it, where do you think the tens of thousands of fans camped up there are going to go?

Pete
 
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Re:

Froome's bike had a broken fork apparently:

CnVhp7vXEAAeqMa.jpg
 
May 20, 2016
1,218
0
5,480
Re: Re:

djpbaltimore said:
The Hitch said:
In 2011 stage 1 Contador's group got taken out by a spectator on a flat stage. He lost 1.20 and without that loss he would have been on the podium.

Why should spectators taking out riders suddenly be neutralised if its never been before?

Apples and oranges. You have the fact that the motorbike was involved, so there is some direct responsibility for the organization. And you have the fact that the team support was essentially nil due to the course congestion.

Motorbike was involved but fan caused the crash.
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Re:

JetSet said:
This is what happens when the biggest stage has the last 5k lopped of it, where do you think the tens of thousands of fans camped up there are going to go?

Pete

Yeah, I did not foresee this, but it was foreseeable in retrospect. Shame on the organisers.
 
Mar 27, 2010
1,781
46
10,530
Re: Re:

spalco said:
Froome's bike had a broken fork apparently:

CnVhp7vXEAAeqMa.jpg

Well that explained why he left it. Figured there was some real reason. And this was not exactly fixable.
 
Aug 28, 2012
4,250
51
15,580
Re:

Pantani Attacks said:
What rule have they invented to prevent Froome from being DQ'd for moving without a bike?

Inb4 they penalise Aru but not Froome

Your allowed to do so if your team car is blocked to reach neutral service, the Sky car was stuck behind the jury's.
 
May 20, 2016
1,218
0
5,480
This decision makes the situation even worse. At first you had 2.5 riders affected by the decision (Mollema managed to keep going quickly so I give 0.5) but now the whole peloton is affected by this and there are even more people who are not happy. Terrible decision.
 
May 26, 2012
105
0
0
Even after neutralization Quintana is winner here...he would have definitely lost more seconds without that incident.
 
Nov 7, 2010
8,820
246
17,880
Re:

Sartorius said:
Even after neutralization Quintana is winner here...he would have definitely lost more seconds without that incident.
Obviously you can't know that.
 
Nov 26, 2011
2,007
4
11,485
Re: Re:

Gloin22 said:
infeXio said:
Oliwright said:
infeXio said:
WillemS said:
Apparently, the two will get Mollema's time.

That's messed up..

how?

How is it not?

Spectators have caused crashes before with no neutralisations taking place.

Indeed. But this was and could be blamed on ASO directly.

The fans from the top got down and there was too many people on the road. They **** up.

So by that logic ASO have to compensate Froome but not the rest of the peloton for the sheer reason that he was essentially held back more than others..