Basically.Zinoviev Letter said:It was a good sprint by Greipel. He pulled himself and Cavendish a mile clear of the rest and was clever enough to sprint at a slight leftward angle, forcing Cavendish to take a long route around. Cavendish was just faster.
He was out ahead for 200 m or so, on an incline. Cav was in the wheel for all but 50 m of that.PremierAndrew said:Tbf Greipel had the perfect position. He still had someone in front of him who was about to accelerate when he decided to go. Cav was just stronger, enough to come around Greipel and take the win
Post of the dayRed Rick said:Finish had a 2% gradient, meaning, Kittel was nowhere
Irondan said:I thought it was Degenkolb too...deValtos said:Wasn't that Degenkolb?![]()
It's difficult to remember and differentiate all those Germans nowadays.Irondan said:I thought it was Degenkolb too...deValtos said:Wasn't that Degenkolb?![]()
WillemS said:Dumoulin has a lot of critique on today's course on Dutch television.
He says a course like today's, over 200km long with no incentives to attack, has no place in a GT and especially the TdF.
Arredondo said:WillemS said:Dumoulin has a lot of critique on today's course on Dutch television.
He says a course like today's, over 200km long with no incentives to attack, has no place in a GT and especially the TdF.
He's absolutely right ofcourse. A torture to the mind and eyes.
WillemS said:Dumoulin has a lot of critique on today's course on Dutch television.
He says a course like today's, over 200km long with no incentives to attack, has no place in a GT and especially the TdF.
You're talking of a 4-seconds gap in a meh race.Bye Bye Bicycle said:Red Rick said:Finish had a 2% gradient, meaning, Kittel was nowhere
Blablabla... he nearly won here:
![]()
Today his trains sucked, that's all.
