Even more with the recent interview of Bardet.Poursuivant said:ASO won't have a true flat TT at the Tour for the foreseeable future if they think Froome will do this to everyone.
Just look at Indurain's Tour de Frances. Very entertaining!jsem94 said:Can you imagine if this was in the 80s or 90s with more than 100km of TT? Froome would have been 5-6 minutes ahead of everyone.Stan955 said:So basically he would've won both GT due to TT'sjsem94 said:If he hadn't been caught out of Contador's ambush, he could have won the Vuelta this year no doubt. So how is it not doable?
Thank godPoursuivant said:ASO won't have a true flat TT at the Tour for the foreseeable future if they think Froome will do this to everyone.
Ataraxus said:Sky lost Froome his third GT.
Won him 3 others.
Ataraxus said:Sky lost Froome his third GT.
Won him 3 others.
Not only that but Quintana would have still put some seconds (~40 seconds maybe) to a tired Froome in the stage to Formigal. Froome was visible tired from the day before.RattaKuningas said:I'm not agreeing with things like Contador won Quintana the Vuelta and Sky lost Froome the Vuelta because we still have stage 20 tomorrow. If Quintana beats Froome comfortably tomorrow then Quintana would've won the Vuelta anyways.
Doubt there is yo-yo man tomorrow. Sky are going to try and make this like a TDF stage and Froome is going to attack quite early, he will either win or die on his bike imho. It's not in his nature to accept 2nd place by riding a steady pace on that final climb.hfer07 said:I was calculating a 1: 30 max for Quintana to lose against Yo-Yo-man, but it turned to be 2:16![]()
just imaging if the parcours was 55K.....
Anyways -- If rational dictates the course, Quintana should not be having trouble defending his lead tomorrow, but Who knows with Yo-Yo-man .......
I guess we'll just have to settle for a close battle for red thenbarmaher said:Unfortunately for those that love drama, it is hard to see tomorrow's stage being tough enough for a real close battle for green. The final climb suits Quintana quite a bit.
Why? Nairo would've had to attack really badly on any big mountain stage in such a case. would be fun for sure.Poursuivant said:ASO won't have a true flat TT at the Tour for the foreseeable future if they think Froome will do this to everyone.
Escarabajo said:Not only that but Quintana would have still put some seconds (~40 seconds maybe) to a tired Froome in the stage to Formigal. Froome was visible tired from the day before.RattaKuningas said:I'm not agreeing with things like Contador won Quintana the Vuelta and Sky lost Froome the Vuelta because we still have stage 20 tomorrow. If Quintana beats Froome comfortably tomorrow then Quintana would've won the Vuelta anyways.
IndianCyclist said:In contrast to last year's TT, Dumoulin must have been off pace for Froome to gap an in form Quintana by this much. Or did the wind play a much more role today?
Billie said:shame Froome didn't bother to take time back Wednesday
Escarabajo said:40 kms is fine. You put more and you get Wiggins Tour de Frances or Indurain's. So why being a fan of it.
RattaKuningas said:Billie said:shame Froome didn't bother to take time back Wednesday
He couldn't because he had difficulties staying with the other 3.
Billie said:RattaKuningas said:Billie said:shame Froome didn't bother to take time back Wednesday
He couldn't because he had difficulties staying with the other 3.
he had enough energy left to overtake them in the last metres
yoyo doesn't work when he has to take time back
Walkman said:Escarabajo said:40 kms is fine. You put more and you get Wiggins Tour de Frances or Indurain's. So why being a fan of it.
Selective memory much?
2007 was the best race since 2003, which also hade just happened to have a lot of TT-kilometers.
Billie said:RattaKuningas said:Billie said:shame Froome didn't bother to take time back Wednesday
He couldn't because he had difficulties staying with the other 3.
he had enough energy left to overtake them in the last metres
yoyo doesn't work when he has to take time back
