Unsurprisingly, you've missed the point. If you want GC action early in a GT you're much better off having technical classics style stages or stages with possibility of crosswinds, than high mountain stages inthe first week. Particularly high mountain stages with very few steep sections and a flattish finish.Brullnux said:You're right, Tour designs of the noughties are they way forwardDFA123 said:You'd think if the headwind was that bad though, that a solo lesser name rider wouldn't be able to win relatively comfortably despite being in the break all day.
I think its just the consequence of big climbs early in the race. No-one wants to do an early attack and risk blowing up, and nobody really wants to have to waste energy defending the MR for the next few days. A stage for the race design thread aficionados to perhaps pay attention to.
rick james said:What the hell? why even post crap like this?hfer07 said:This is the kind of stage in the first week of a GT that Contador is sooo missed![]()
anyways...... I expect either a breakaway winner or Landa/Pinot/G to out sprint the rest of the GC contenders with no gaps whatsoever....
Rollthedice said:The only unexpected thing was Polanc winning so I'm not sure what people were expecting for a windy hard MTF on the fourth stage after a rest day. Some people who are actually competing here want to win the Giro and Etna was not the place to do it.
Because nobody actually wants it this early. Nobody has the team to control the Giro for three weeks.Escarabajo said:It looks like nobody wanted pink!
I agree matehfer07 said:rick james said:What the hell? why even post crap like this?hfer07 said:This is the kind of stage in the first week of a GT that Contador is sooo missed![]()
anyways...... I expect either a breakaway winner or Landa/Pinot/G to out sprint the rest of the GC contenders with no gaps whatsoever....
come again?![]()
Pantani_lives said:Giving time to Zakarin was a huge blunder. He's a favorite to win this Giro. Zakarin, Thomas and Dumoulin are the three favorites, because they're better at the time trials and nothing will happen in the mountains.
Astana looked rather good, but they're missing Aru.SafeBet said:There's one thing this stage told us: there's no super team here. Even Sky and Movistar didn't impress me. The level of domestiques is pretty weak overall, which could make for some very entertaining racing from now on.
Because nobody actually wants it this early. Nobody has the team to control the Giro for three weeks.Escarabajo said:It looks like nobody wanted pink!
SafeBet said:There's one thing this stage told us: there's no super team here. Even Sky and Movistar didn't impress me. The level of domestiques is pretty weak overall, which could make for some very entertaining racing from now on.
Deserved win for Polanc
Because nobody actually wants it this early. Nobody has the team to control the Giro for three weeks.Escarabajo said:It looks like nobody wanted pink!
I think Amador was there for Quintana as well, Astana had 2 or 3 too I think.deValtos said:SafeBet said:There's one thing this stage told us: there's no super team here. Even Sky and Movistar didn't impress me. The level of domestiques is pretty weak overall, which could make for some very entertaining racing from now on.
Deserved win for Polanc
Because nobody actually wants it this early. Nobody has the team to control the Giro for three weeks.Escarabajo said:It looks like nobody wanted pink!
Actually it turns out this years Giro super team is Cannondale. :lol:
4 riders in the group, did anyone else have more than 1? Astana might have had a couple iirc, Sky had the 2 leaders.
Hopefully they start putting riders in the early breaks instead of thinking at the team classification.deValtos said:Actually it turns out this years Giro super team is Cannondale. :lol:
4 riders in the group, did anyone else have more than 1? Astana might have had a couple iirc, Sky had the 2 leaders.
SafeBet said:There's one thing this stage told us: there's no super team here. Even Sky and Movistar didn't impress me. The level of domestiques is pretty weak overall, which could make for some very entertaining racing from now on.
Deserved win for Polanc
Because nobody actually wants it this early. Nobody has the team to control the Giro for three weeks.Escarabajo said:It looks like nobody wanted pink!
I guess the theory is that if Quintana or Nibali are on or close to top form, they will gain in the mountains way more than the 2-3 minutes they may lose to Dumoulin or Zakarin in the TT.movingtarget said:Pantani_lives said:Giving time to Zakarin was a huge blunder. He's a favorite to win this Giro. Zakarin, Thomas and Dumoulin are the three favorites, because they're better at the time trials and nothing will happen in the mountains.
He never looks too comfortable on descents. Many people don't think the TTs will have much effect. Not so sure about that.
You get crappy MTFs in the third week of a GT as well. Look at Cervinia in 2015: really difficult stage, terrible action. Or Finhaut Emosson, or Montecampione 2014 - the list goes on. These climbs rarely get a great race, only when you have Contador to decimate everyone else is it actually any good. I don't think that it's a necessity to avoid hard mountains early on, because even when they included cobbles in 2015 it was extremely disappointing.DFA123 said:Unsurprisingly, you've missed the point. If you want GC action early in a GT you're much better off having technical classics style stages or stages with possibility of crosswinds, than high mountain stages inthe first week. Particularly high mountain stages with very few steep sections and a flattish finish.Brullnux said:You're right, Tour designs of the noughties are they way forwardDFA123 said:You'd think if the headwind was that bad though, that a solo lesser name rider wouldn't be able to win relatively comfortably despite being in the break all day.
I think its just the consequence of big climbs early in the race. No-one wants to do an early attack and risk blowing up, and nobody really wants to have to waste energy defending the MR for the next few days. A stage for the race design thread aficionados to perhaps pay attention to.
BullsFan22 said:Well hopefully Polanc will be able to walk tomorrow, let alone ride another stage, that was brutal. I could feel the pain.
Pricey_sky said:portugal11 said:Quintana, pinot, landa, thomas,... what a joke of riders
They have to drop Thomas in the mountains, he should gain time on most in the TT. It's on Quintana, Nibali, Pinot and co to do that.
I think also it shows that having loads of hard mountains stages is going to result in a lot of dud stages, because the best climbers have so many other opportunities to gain time. Why risk wasting energy when circumstances aren't optimal - like they weren't today - when you know that there will be a lot better opportunities later in the race.veji11 said:You know what this type of stage, or rather, how it was raced, makes you realise ? Actually that first big nasty ITT early in a GT Indurain Tour de France style might not be that bad... imagine we had the first 40kms ITT today and tomorrow the Etna.. Dumoulin, Thomas, Jungels would already have some nice time up on the Quintanas or Yates or SK, with the Pinots and Nibalis in between. Suddenly you think you might as well start clawing back some of that time on the Etna...
veji11 said:You know what this type of stage, or rather, how it was raced, makes you realise ? Actually that first big nasty ITT early in a GT Indurain Tour de France style might not be that bad... imagine we had the first 40kms ITT today and tomorrow the Etna.. Dumoulin, Thomas, Jungels would already have some nice time up on the Quintanas or Yates or SK, with the Pinots and Nibalis in between. Suddenly you think you might as well start clawing back some of that time on the Etna...
DFA123 said:They went the wrong way? Didn't seem the best organisation on that corner.