DFA123 said:I guess the theory is that if Quintana or Nibali are on or close to top form, they will gain in the mountains way more than the 2-3 minutes they may lose to Dumoulin or Zakarin in the TT.movingtarget said:Pantani_lives said:Giving time to Zakarin was a huge blunder. He's a favorite to win this Giro. Zakarin, Thomas and Dumoulin are the three favorites, because they're better at the time trials and nothing will happen in the mountains.
He never looks too comfortable on descents. Many people don't think the TTs will have much effect. Not so sure about that.
Attacking hard and early from a large group on a climb with gentle gradients, a headwind and when everyone is really fresh after three soft pedalled stages and a rest day would be a great way to waste energy and put yourself in a hole. Especially given how hard that third week is.
movingtarget said:BullsFan22 said:Well hopefully Polanc will be able to walk tomorrow, let alone ride another stage, that was brutal. I could feel the pain.
His speech was a bit labored unsurprisingly ! You could hear the tiredness in his voice. Hopefully he is not on bottle distribution tomorrow !
Can't wait to see pinot dropping like a stone on blockhausSafeBet said:Pinot: "our team worked a lot but it seems nobody really wanted to win today"
Visconti: "pulling for one km now means working a lot?"
![]()
Well yeah, but I wouldn't call that attacking hard and early. He managed to kind of sneak away during a drop in pace 1.5km from the line. Not really much time to waste energy. He also has the advantage that he's not Nibali or Quintana, so about 10 riders won't immediately jump on his wheel every time he tries to do anything.movingtarget said:DFA123 said:I guess the theory is that if Quintana or Nibali are on or close to top form, they will gain in the mountains way more than the 2-3 minutes they may lose to Dumoulin or Zakarin in the TT.movingtarget said:Pantani_lives said:Giving time to Zakarin was a huge blunder. He's a favorite to win this Giro. Zakarin, Thomas and Dumoulin are the three favorites, because they're better at the time trials and nothing will happen in the mountains.
He never looks too comfortable on descents. Many people don't think the TTs will have much effect. Not so sure about that.
Attacking hard and early from a large group on a climb with gentle gradients, a headwind and when everyone is really fresh after three soft pedalled stages and a rest day would be a great way to waste energy and put yourself in a hole. Especially given how hard that third week is.
Zakarin didn't waste too much energy and the margin was still worth it with the bonus.
Yeah, but why did they take the corner too quickly? Perhaps there wasn't good enough signage beforehand. It was a pretty sharp corner being approached at 50km/h+, so probably needed a bit more warning than the usual pink arrow.yaco said:DFA123 said:They went the wrong way? Didn't seem the best organisation on that corner.
Nah - The riders took the corner too quickly - The stage winner Polanc from the breakaway nearly went off at the same corner.
Arredondo said:Dekker_Tifosi said:you do realize that even tho Kruijswijk was his usual lesser self he was still in the group. Eg he didn't lose timeArredondo said:Winners of today: Zakarin, Thomas, Dumoulin, Quintana, Landa (no time loss despite the problems today)
Losers of the day: Kruijswijk, Costa, that's it really
I know, but he was just hanging in there. Would have been dropped if some GC guys had the balls to attack hard in those last 3 km.
I just feel he will disappoint this Giro. But let's see first![]()
Alpe d'Huez said:So much for epic.
The real winner here is Nibali I think. He talked up the stage, but when you look at his past, he's always best in the last week of GT's, the final few mountain stages especially. When he's been up front like this early in the mountains, he usually walks away the overall winner.
DFA123 said:Yeah, but why did they take the corner too quickly? Perhaps there wasn't good enough signage beforehand. It was a pretty sharp corner being approached at 50km/h+, so probably needed a bit more warning than the usual pink arrow.yaco said:DFA123 said:They went the wrong way? Didn't seem the best organisation on that corner.
Nah - The riders took the corner too quickly - The stage winner Polanc from the breakaway nearly went off at the same corner.
Perhaps there was enough signs and the riders just misjudged it anyway, but Polanc nearly going off as well suggests a bit more warning could have been needed.
staubsauger said:I'm not convinced Quintana got gt winning shape anymore. If so he easily could've gained some seconds like Pantani on Gran Sasso d'Italia! Looks like we've about 5-10 equal guys that could potentially win the Giro on paper.
If Quintana really ain't got his prime shape and since Pinot fails anyway somewhere along the way ... Steven is nicely flying under the radar once again 1 year later.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Arredondo said:Dekker_Tifosi said:you do realize that even tho Kruijswijk was his usual lesser self he was still in the group. Eg he didn't lose timeArredondo said:Winners of today: Zakarin, Thomas, Dumoulin, Quintana, Landa (no time loss despite the problems today)
Losers of the day: Kruijswijk, Costa, that's it really
I know, but he was just hanging in there. Would have been dropped if some GC guys had the balls to attack hard in those last 3 km.
I just feel he will disappoint this Giro. But let's see first![]()
Well for one, I said he will normally lose time on early mountains. He's a 3rd week rider, not 1st one. He has been WAY worse in 1st mt stage tests.
But 2, and that is why I agree he won't do as well as last year, he fell in Yorkshire and he fell again today. So this year nothing is ideal. And he really needs ideal circumstances. Vuelta last year proved that, he was sick somewhere in the preparation there and as a result sucked in the Vuelta and never really got better.
However, I think it's too early to say he will be bad per se (like in, not top 10). What you have to keep in mind with Kruijswijk is that there is a certain pattern. In the 1st week he has real trouble when it gets hard, in the 2nd week he rises to the top and in the 3rd week he is at his best. That's because his level between 1st and 3rd week hardly drops.
But his 1st week level is not good enough to do much. Which is incidentally the same reason he never does something in 1 week races.
It's really strange I still need to explain this every year. Thought people knew by now. Kruijswijk is a diesel..
staubsauger said:I'm not convinced Quintana got gt winning shape anymore. If so he easily could've gained some seconds like Pantani on Gran Sasso d'Italia! Looks like we've about 5-10 equal guys that could potentially win the Giro on paper.
Kruijswijk is the big winner today actually. He lost zero time since nobody made a move while he's the only contender that certainly gains significant time in the tt against Quintana, without losing a bunch in the mountains afterwards. That was a missed chance for the others to kill him off. If Kruijswijk stays alive after Blockhaus, he might find himself in a quite similar situation to last year's race after the tt.
If Quintana really ain't got his prime shape and since Pinot fails anyway somewhere along the way ... Steven is nicely flying under the radar once again 1 year later.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Yeah I really don't know why they didn't utilize a mountain as tough as the Etna.
Must have been the wind else I can only say it's stupidity
Asero831 said:GT should only be 2 weeks. It's time
Villella tried to bridge across with Jaregui at the beginning of the stage but they were absorbed back into the bunch. Not always easy for climbers to get into the break if the beginning of the stage is totally flat.SafeBet said:Hopefully they start putting riders in the early breaks instead of thinking at the team classification.deValtos said:Actually it turns out this years Giro super team is Cannondale. :lol:
4 riders in the group, did anyone else have more than 1? Astana might have had a couple iirc, Sky had the 2 leaders.
They could win 2-3 stages.
I said Kruiswijk is the only one to do so without losing a bunch of it in the mountains again. Unless Pinot gets his act together or Nibali turns back the clock 3 years.Mr.White said:staubsauger said:I'm not convinced Quintana got gt winning shape anymore. If so he easily could've gained some seconds like Pantani on Gran Sasso d'Italia! Looks like we've about 5-10 equal guys that could potentially win the Giro on paper.
Kruijswijk is the big winner today actually. He lost zero time since nobody made a move while he's the only contender that certainly gains significant time in the tt against Quintana, without losing a bunch in the mountains afterwards. That was a missed chance for the others to kill him off. If Kruijswijk stays alive after Blockhaus, he might find himself in a quite similar situation to last year's race after the tt.
If Quintana really ain't got his prime shape and since Pinot fails anyway somewhere along the way ... Steven is nicely flying under the radar once again 1 year later.
Quintana announced he's going "easy" in the first week, building form. I expect much higher level at the Blockhaus and the TT, and absolute peak at Stelvio and Dolomites stage.
So Kruiswijk is the only GC contender that certainly gains time on Quintana in the TT? Really? Since when he's such a good TT-ist? What about Nibali, Pinot, Zakarin?! And I'm not sure he'll gain any time on Quintana!