DFA123 said:A Tour de France stage just isn't comparable to a one day race though. The specialists aren't there in top form, and fatigue from previous days plays much more of a role. The stages tend to be a lot more aerobic than the constant anaerobic demands of a classic. Re. Contador in 2013 - of course some climbers can get a gap on an isolated climb, but they can't do it repeatedly and then solo to the line after 250km - and none of them can sprint. So they're not realistic contenders.Red Rick said:Froome was 2nd on the Mur de Huy. Contador rode LBL in 2013 and was in an attack over the Redoute, even though it was his worst year in a decade. Bardet has challenged for a number of years now. Nibali won that hilly stage of the 2014 Tour. The length of the climbs in LBL is just enough for purer climbers to challenge the punchers. It's a lot of 3-5 minute efforts.
The problem is not that they can't do it. The problem is that most don't want to peak for a week in which they may not ever get results because gaps are so small and the field is so deep.
We saw it in the Olympics last year - which the GC riders there did peak for. A lot of people tipping the likes of Froome and even Porte (!); but they faded and the top 5 was ultimately filled by riders with decent one-day pedigree.
There's just no evidence to suggest that Froome or Contador at their peak nowdays could seriously challenge for a win at LBL. Froome, in particular, would just be using up a place of a much more talented one day racer at Sky.
MikeTichondrius said:Peloton still pretty big. Break has to be running low on gas. Still, 3:30 for 30k is gonna need some proper chasing...
Not sure about that. He is wasting energy. That's what his main lieutenants should do. Shutting down attacks from the outsiders.Valv.Piti said:Good tactics by Valverde today. Should have done that in Amstel as well.
silvergrenade said:DFA123 said:A Tour de France stage just isn't comparable to a one day race though. The specialists aren't there in top form, and fatigue from previous days plays much more of a role. The stages tend to be a lot more aerobic than the constant anaerobic demands of a classic. Re. Contador in 2013 - of course some climbers can get a gap on an isolated climb, but they can't do it repeatedly and then solo to the line after 250km - and none of them can sprint. So they're not realistic contenders.Red Rick said:Froome was 2nd on the Mur de Huy. Contador rode LBL in 2013 and was in an attack over the Redoute, even though it was his worst year in a decade. Bardet has challenged for a number of years now. Nibali won that hilly stage of the 2014 Tour. The length of the climbs in LBL is just enough for purer climbers to challenge the punchers. It's a lot of 3-5 minute efforts.
The problem is not that they can't do it. The problem is that most don't want to peak for a week in which they may not ever get results because gaps are so small and the field is so deep.
We saw it in the Olympics last year - which the GC riders there did peak for. A lot of people tipping the likes of Froome and even Porte (!); but they faded and the top 5 was ultimately filled by riders with decent one-day pedigree.
There's just no evidence to suggest that Froome or Contador at their peak nowdays could seriously challenge for a win at LBL. Froome, in particular, would just be using up a place of a much more talented one day racer at Sky.
This is Ridiculous!
Just to prove you wrong, Bardet to Top 5 today
Flags looked pretty still on the RedouteGuyIncognito said:MikeTichondrius said:Peloton still pretty big. Break has to be running low on gas. Still, 3:30 for 30k is gonna need some proper chasing...
Nah, there's a headwind
I haven't said anything about Bardet. I was talking about Froome and Contador.silvergrenade said:DFA123 said:A Tour de France stage just isn't comparable to a one day race though. The specialists aren't there in top form, and fatigue from previous days plays much more of a role. The stages tend to be a lot more aerobic than the constant anaerobic demands of a classic. Re. Contador in 2013 - of course some climbers can get a gap on an isolated climb, but they can't do it repeatedly and then solo to the line after 250km - and none of them can sprint. So they're not realistic contenders.Red Rick said:Froome was 2nd on the Mur de Huy. Contador rode LBL in 2013 and was in an attack over the Redoute, even though it was his worst year in a decade. Bardet has challenged for a number of years now. Nibali won that hilly stage of the 2014 Tour. The length of the climbs in LBL is just enough for purer climbers to challenge the punchers. It's a lot of 3-5 minute efforts.
The problem is not that they can't do it. The problem is that most don't want to peak for a week in which they may not ever get results because gaps are so small and the field is so deep.
We saw it in the Olympics last year - which the GC riders there did peak for. A lot of people tipping the likes of Froome and even Porte (!); but they faded and the top 5 was ultimately filled by riders with decent one-day pedigree.
There's just no evidence to suggest that Froome or Contador at their peak nowdays could seriously challenge for a win at LBL. Froome, in particular, would just be using up a place of a much more talented one day racer at Sky.
This is Ridiculous!
Just to prove you wrong, Bardet to Top 5 today
Nah. They look very tired.MikeTichondrius said:Peloton still pretty big. Break has to be running low on gas. Still, 3:30 for 30k is gonna need some proper chasing...
the asian said:A 260 KM race is much harder than your average Grand Tour Stage.
VMT. Unless I'm mistaken, Matthews is still there, so is GVA and a lot of other dangerous puncheurs who can potentialy go solo. And not much time left to drop them.Velolover2 said:Nah. They look very tired.MikeTichondrius said:Peloton still pretty big. Break has to be running low on gas. Still, 3:30 for 30k is gonna need some proper chasing...
The favorites should be more concerned about the size of the peloton. It's still very large.
Of all the GC guys Nibali is the best Unfortunately his training has gotten pretty weird every since 2013DFA123 said:I haven't said anything about Bardet. I was talking about Froome and Contador.silvergrenade said:DFA123 said:A Tour de France stage just isn't comparable to a one day race though. The specialists aren't there in top form, and fatigue from previous days plays much more of a role. The stages tend to be a lot more aerobic than the constant anaerobic demands of a classic. Re. Contador in 2013 - of course some climbers can get a gap on an isolated climb, but they can't do it repeatedly and then solo to the line after 250km - and none of them can sprint. So they're not realistic contenders.Red Rick said:Froome was 2nd on the Mur de Huy. Contador rode LBL in 2013 and was in an attack over the Redoute, even though it was his worst year in a decade. Bardet has challenged for a number of years now. Nibali won that hilly stage of the 2014 Tour. The length of the climbs in LBL is just enough for purer climbers to challenge the punchers. It's a lot of 3-5 minute efforts.
The problem is not that they can't do it. The problem is that most don't want to peak for a week in which they may not ever get results because gaps are so small and the field is so deep.
We saw it in the Olympics last year - which the GC riders there did peak for. A lot of people tipping the likes of Froome and even Porte (!); but they faded and the top 5 was ultimately filled by riders with decent one-day pedigree.
There's just no evidence to suggest that Froome or Contador at their peak nowdays could seriously challenge for a win at LBL. Froome, in particular, would just be using up a place of a much more talented one day racer at Sky.
This is Ridiculous!
Just to prove you wrong, Bardet to Top 5 today![]()
Bardet, imo, is one of the best GC contenders at one day races - because he has a bit more anaerobic punch. He has top 10s and has looked threatening in both Lombardia and Liege. Contador (post ban) and Froome quite simply have never threatened for the win in any classic. Which is probably why they don't bother entering any more, while Bardet does.
I think he could do very well at a hard version of Lombardia. It's impossible to see how he could win or threaten on Liege though I think - especially on this course. He can't solo away and TT for 30km, the way it's ridden these days with a biggish peloton until late on, and he can't sprint. Also not the best descender.Valv.Piti said:I'd like to see a peak Quintana here. Its probably not gonna happen and chances are he won't get more than a top-10, but such a long and hard enduro race should suit him well on paper, no?
http://live.robinwidget.org/streamvideo8/cycling-vs-liege-bastogne-liege-live-stream-195030.htmlRicheypen said:Has anyone got a working stream? All my normal ones are non funtioning
Flamin said:Never heard of this Perez guy btw. Strong guy.
Very true.DFA123 said:VMT. Unless I'm mistaken, Matthews is still there, so is GVA and a lot of other dangerous puncheurs who can potentialy go solo. And not much time left to drop them.Velolover2 said:Nah. They look very tired.MikeTichondrius said:Peloton still pretty big. Break has to be running low on gas. Still, 3:30 for 30k is gonna need some proper chasing...
The favorites should be more concerned about the size of the peloton. It's still very large.
I think Valverde is head and shoulders above all the other GC guys, including Nibali. Nibali could do well here again, especially if it rains; but yeah, it's difficult to say given how rollercoaster like his form and peaking seems nowdays.IndianCyclist said:Of all the GC guys Nibali is the best Unfortunately his training has gotten pretty weird every since 2013