L
This is kind of a vague statement. All we need is one or two of them to be inconsistent with altitude. I don't know enough about the details to comment, my only point is that ABP seems to be more sensitive than the "adverse analytical finding" tests, so at what point does it make sense to redirect funding from AAF testing to more comprehensive/frequent ABP testing?
I've always thought the Off-score and retics would be likely to show blood manipulation. i don't know how they get away with those. However all of the other blood values are likely to change in a similar fashion whether it's from altitude or EPO. So my assumption is that altitude training and EPO use could not be easily distinguished.
All of these can changes due to increased red blood cell production:
- HCT - Haematocrit
- HGB - Haemoglobin (1 and 2 are redundant anyways since they will change at same rate))
- RBC - Red blood cell (erythrocyte) count
- RDW-SD - Red cell distribution width (standard deviation)
These, I believe, are unlikely to change, whether from altitude or EPO, since they measure the health (in oxygen carrying capacity) of blood cells. Altitude and EPO increase the production of RBCs, not the quality of the blood cells produced:
- MCH - Mean corpuscular haemoglobin
- MCHC - Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration
- MCV - Mean corpuscular volume
And these other 2 are a standard part of every CBC but not going to be relevant to the boost in red blood cell production:
- PLT - Platelets
- BC - White Blood Cells
That would seem to leave the off-score and retics as difficult to fool the ABP? But I don't know much about those two.