Those of you saying it was obvious Sagan should've gone with Terpstra and Nibali, were you saying that an hour ago?
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
DFA123 said:I thought his team was one of the better ones in the race. Obviously nowhere near the level of Quickstep, but he had Oss and Burghardt around quite late on. He needed to work with the likes of Benoot and Vanmarcke before the Kwaremont though (who I think would have been more than willing to take a pull). Not just try to drop them all on the Paterberg and go solo - that literally had a 0% chance of working against a rider as strong as Terpstra.Irondan said:His **** team isn't much help either..DFA123 said:Great race by Terpstra. Too easy in the end for Quickstep though. Sagan looked the strongest of the rest but, as usual, his tactics were shockingly poor.
The most obvious thing about this race was that a Quickstep rider - almost certainly Gilbert or Terpstra - would attack in the last 40km and that it would be extremely dangerous without a very quick response from the other favourites. It doesn't take hindsight to spot that. All the favourites should have responded very quickly and, as the guy who ultimately looked the strongest - it seems that Sagan lost out more than the others as a result.The Barb said:DFA123 said:Yep, and then once Terpstra is clear. He obviously should have reacted to the move much more quickly, not just wait until the Paterberg and try to drop everyone there - when the guy up the road is a much superior rouleur to him.
Seriously?
Right, he should have picked the winning attack, then if the others wouldn't ride with him just powered away solo from the QS team riding as a team. Brilliant.
phanatic said:Irondan said:His **** team isn't much help either..DFA123 said:Great race by Terpstra. Too easy in the end for Quickstep though. Sagan looked the strongest of the rest but, as usual, his tactics were shockingly poor.
Quick step is just way better than the rest. Maybe Sagan should just follow Nibali.
The Barb said:Those of you saying it was obvious Sagan should've gone with Terpstra and Nibali, were you saying that an hour ago?
Van Avermaet and Benoot tried to bridge but weren't strong enough.DFA123 said:The most obvious thing about this race was that a Quickstep rider - almost certainly Gilbert or Terpstra - would attack in the last 40km and that it would be extremely dangerous without a very quick response from the other favourites. It doesn't take hindsight to spot that. All the favourites should have responded very quickly and, as the guy who ultimately looked the strongest - it seems that Sagan lost out more than the others as a result.The Barb said:DFA123 said:Yep, and then once Terpstra is clear. He obviously should have reacted to the move much more quickly, not just wait until the Paterberg and try to drop everyone there - when the guy up the road is a much superior rouleur to him.
Seriously?
Right, he should have picked the winning attack, then if the others wouldn't ride with him just powered away solo from the QS team riding as a team. Brilliant.
Yeah, the Ardennes classics come in for a lot of criticism for their formulaic predictability. Rightly so at times. But the cobbled classics have been just as bad this year. The lack of co-operation between strong riders doesn't make for a great spectacle. As soon as a strong Quickstep rider gets a reasonable gap - it's race over.Alexandre B. said:This year, leaders have extreme difficulty to collaborate with each other when another strong rider is up the road.
portugal11 said:roelandts had the legs to cover terpstra's attack!! But guess what? they waited for... Sagan!!alspacka said:BalearicBeats said:More Strides than Rides said:Avermaet did it! He beat Sagan! Against all odds! Bet he's super satisfied with his riding today...
He and Sagan were the only favorites to attack today (except for Terpstra of course)? I didn't see him skip any turns or anything, he tried at least.
Yes I don't understand GVA criticism here. He clearly was not as strong as previously and BMC did have Roelandts chase while he could.
DFA123 said:It looked like they just didn't have the legs. They weren't in the shape to drop everyone on the Paterberg. Sagan was, and should have used some of that energy earlier when Terpstra wasn't already out of sight.trucido said:DFA123 said:Great race by Terpstra. Too easy in the end for Quickstep though. Sagan looked the strongest of the rest but, as usual, his tactics were shockingly poor.
How was GvA and Vanmarcke's any better? Enlighten us.
Cance > TheRest said:Well, to their defenses, they just didn't look like they had the strength. Sagan, at least, showed that he could make the difference
Isn't that what Sagan is always like? He can drop anyone at almost any point in a race, but he's not a great rouleur and he is virtually never part of a successful chase.Escarabajo said:Sagan didn't look strong to me IMO. Something is missing. His power is there but not his aerobic delivery.
At one point he was waving his hands for other riders to go around where he seemed the one to be slowing down the chase.
Well deserved win for Terpstra.
DFA123 said:It looked like they just didn't have the legs. They weren't in the shape to drop everyone on the Paterberg. Sagan was, and should have used some of that energy earlier when Terpstra wasn't already out of sight.trucido said:DFA123 said:Great race by Terpstra. Too easy in the end for Quickstep though. Sagan looked the strongest of the rest but, as usual, his tactics were shockingly poor.
How was GvA and Vanmarcke's any better? Enlighten us.
I don't think I was logged on then, but it seemed like probably the best thing to do at the time yes. Obviously its an in the moment thing and is very hard to decide in the race, but its not outlandish. Lets de-contextualise a moment:The Barb said:Those of you saying it was obvious Sagan should've gone with Terpstra and Nibali, were you saying that an hour ago?
it is all about sagan right? what about roelandts?DFA123 said:The most obvious thing about this race was that a Quickstep rider - almost certainly Gilbert or Terpstra - would attack in the last 40km and that it would be extremely dangerous without a very quick response from the other favourites. It doesn't take hindsight to spot that. All the favourites should have responded very quickly and, as the guy who ultimately looked the strongest - it seems that Sagan lost out more than the others as a result.The Barb said:DFA123 said:Yep, and then once Terpstra is clear. He obviously should have reacted to the move much more quickly, not just wait until the Paterberg and try to drop everyone there - when the guy up the road is a much superior rouleur to him.
Seriously?
Right, he should have picked the winning attack, then if the others wouldn't ride with him just powered away solo from the QS team riding as a team. Brilliant.
Yep, Kristoff won the same monument easily by just following Terpstra when no-one else could. And Degenkolb won Paris Roubaix by following a Terpstra attack. He's the number one wheel you should be looking out for if you want a rider whose attack will stick, and who can easily be beaten in a sprint.Brullnux said:I don't see how following the most clearly in form rider (who has an average acceleration) on the wheel of a GT rider (with similarly poor acceleration) isn't an obvious choice. Sagan was basically on his wheel as well. He made the wrong choice, which is fine, but it just happens pretty frequently.
really? you were obviously watching different race. they were together last 8km and didnt work really hard. why do you think that it would be different 15km out?DFA123 said:I thought his team was one of the better ones in the race. Obviously nowhere near the level of Quickstep, but he had Oss and Burghardt around quite late on. He needed to work with the likes of Benoot and Vanmarcke before the Kwaremont though (who I think would have been more than willing to take a pull). Not just try to drop them all on the Paterberg and go solo - that literally had a 0% chance of working against a rider as strong as Terpstra.Irondan said:His **** team isn't much help either..DFA123 said:Great race by Terpstra. Too easy in the end for Quickstep though. Sagan looked the strongest of the rest but, as usual, his tactics were shockingly poor.
SKSemtex said:DFA123 said:It looked like they just didn't have the legs. They weren't in the shape to drop everyone on the Paterberg. Sagan was, and should have used some of that energy earlier when Terpstra wasn't already out of sight.trucido said:DFA123 said:Great race by Terpstra. Too easy in the end for Quickstep though. Sagan looked the strongest of the rest but, as usual, his tactics were shockingly poor.
How was GvA and Vanmarcke's any better? Enlighten us.
You are always general after the race.
If he close the Terpstra stack and could not follow another from Styber or Gilbert you would have called him utterly stupid.. Like you always did when he lose.
What about Roelandts? He wasn't the strongest rider over the final climb in the race.portugal11 said:it is all about sagan right? what about roelandts?DFA123 said:The most obvious thing about this race was that a Quickstep rider - almost certainly Gilbert or Terpstra - would attack in the last 40km and that it would be extremely dangerous without a very quick response from the other favourites. It doesn't take hindsight to spot that. All the favourites should have responded very quickly and, as the guy who ultimately looked the strongest - it seems that Sagan lost out more than the others as a result.The Barb said:DFA123 said:Yep, and then once Terpstra is clear. He obviously should have reacted to the move much more quickly, not just wait until the Paterberg and try to drop everyone there - when the guy up the road is a much superior rouleur to him.
Seriously?
Right, he should have picked the winning attack, then if the others wouldn't ride with him just powered away solo from the QS team riding as a team. Brilliant.
DFA123 said:Yep, Kristoff won the same monument easily by just following Terpstra when no-one else could. And Degenkolb won Paris Roubaix by following a Terpstra attack. He's the number one wheel you should be looking out for if you want a rider whose attack will stick, and who can easily be beaten in a sprint.Brullnux said:I don't see how following the most clearly in form rider (who has an average acceleration) on the wheel of a GT rider (with similarly poor acceleration) isn't an obvious choice. Sagan was basically on his wheel as well. He made the wrong choice, which is fine, but it just happens pretty frequently.
Ridiculous that he wasn't marked more tightly by all the other favourites.