Yep.As a PhD, Kiesenhofer knew she could win by exploiting the others' mental inferiority
It was about counting.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yep.As a PhD, Kiesenhofer knew she could win by exploiting the others' mental inferiority
Would make a lot of senseIt sounds like (again, implying from second-hand reportage of van der Breggen's interview) they were told of the break gaps but not how many riders there were or that the break had split so they didn't realise when they caught the duo at 5 to go that they hadn't actually finished the job.
Machiavellian though it may be, Deignan's interview is the strongest evidence we have that other teams also thought they'd brought everybody back, because she congratulated Annemiek on the win.Can picture it now, Deignan in AVB's ear:
"Yeah, yeah you caught them all!"
As a PhD, Kiesenhofer knew she could win by exploiting the others' mental inferiority
Bold prediction: a Dutch rider will win this bike race.
Did they know how many were away in the first place?You take away radios and they are not able to count how many riders they catch...
I know the one graduated in math was ahead but come on, this is pathetic. I don't know how you can blame the organization.
Hey!What an end to the women’s race…
I dont think the organisation is to blame, Kopecky def understood she had no medal so she knew.
It is quite embarrasing for VV but kinda sad no one seemed to go and congratulate Kiesenhofer. Even after they understood she had been in the front.
See what you did there.Btw this turned out to be comedy gold...
Could well have been some Chinese whispers type stuff going around the péloton because we know Deignan, VV and VDB didn't know, seems ELB didn't either, but Kopecky looks like she did, Vos is now claiming she did, and CUL went and spoke to Kiesenhofer at the end when most people were congratulating Annemiek.Kopecky clearly knew, because she didn't celebrate crossing the line 4th, so no excuses for the Dutch team.
Again, do you really think the guys in the cars, in the feeding zones, along the road didn't know how many are out front?It sounds like (again, implying from second-hand reportage of van der Breggen's interview) they were told of the break gaps but not how many riders there were or that the break had split so they didn't realise when they caught the duo at 5 to go that they hadn't actually finished the job.
Kopecky clearly knew, because she didn't celebrate crossing the line 4th, so no excuses for the Dutch team.
It gets even worse if Vos knewCould well have been some Chinese whispers type stuff going around the péloton because we know Deignan, VV and VDB didn't know, seems ELB didn't either, but Kopecky looks like she did, Vos is now claiming she did, and CUL went and spoke to Kiesenhofer at the end when most people were congratulating Annemiek.
How can you not know? Break had been away for a long time with the peloton strolling around. The team cars surely had a stream of the race on. If they didn't know they are even more amateurish, especially considering the gambling strategy most teams deployed.Did they know how many were away in the first place?
What an end to the women’s race…
I dont think the organisation is to blame, Kopecky def understood she had no medal so she knew.
It is quite embarrasing for VV but kinda sad no one seemed to go and congratulate Kiesenhofer. Even after they understood she had been in the front.
I wonder if Vos is playing diplomatic to protect the idiots in the team car a bit. Her interview was several minutes after van der Breggen and van Vleuten's.It gets even worse if Vos knew